Advertisement
MCP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/mcp.M400087-MCP200 on October 23, 2004.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M400087-MCP200v1
4/1/1    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Glossary
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolkman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Slijper, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kolkman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Slijper, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 4:1-11, 2005.
© 2005 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.


Research

Comparative Proteome Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Grown in Chemostat Cultures Limited for Glucose or Ethanol*

Annemieke Kolkman{ddagger}, Maurien M. A. Olsthoorn§, Carola E. M. Heeremans§, Albert J. R. Heck{ddagger} and Monique Slijper{ddagger}

From the {ddagger} Department of Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands; and § DSM Food Specialties, R&D, Department of Analysis, 2600 MA Delft, The Netherlands

The use of chemostat culturing enables investigation of steady-state physiological characteristics and adaptations to nutrient-limited growth, while all other relevant growth conditions are kept constant. We examined and compared the proteomic response of wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D to growth in aerobic chemostat cultures limited for carbon sources being either glucose or ethanol. To obtain a global overview of changes in the proteome, we performed triplicate analyses using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and identified proteins of interest using MS. Relative quantities of about 400 proteins were obtained and analyzed statistically to determine which protein steady-state expression levels changed significantly under glucose- or ethanol-limited conditions. Interestingly, only enzymes involved in central carbon metabolism showed a significant change in steady-state expression, whereas expression was only detected in one of both carbon source-limiting conditions for 15 of these enzymes. Side effects that were previously reported for batch cultivation conditions, such as responses to continuous variation of specific growth rate, to carbon-catabolite repression, and to accumulation of toxic substrates, were not observed. Moreover, by comparing our proteome data with corresponding mRNA data, we were able to unravel which processes in the central carbon metabolism were regulated at the level of the proteome, and which processes at the level of transcriptome. Importantly, we show here that the combined approach of chemostat cultivation and comprehensive proteome analysis allowed us to study the primary effect of single limiting conditions on the yeast proteome.


To whom correspondence should be addressed: Department of Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, Utrecht University, Sorbonnelaan 16, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands. Tel.: 31-(0)30-2533789; Fax: 31-(0)30-2518219; E-mail: m.slijper{at}pharm.uu.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
F.-M. Lin, B. Qiao, and Y.-J. Yuan
Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Tolerance and Adaptation of Ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Furfural, a Lignocellulosic Inhibitory Compound
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2009; 75(11): 3765 - 3776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
M. J. L. de Groot, P. Daran-Lapujade, B. van Breukelen, T. A. Knijnenburg, E. A. F. de Hulster, M. J. T. Reinders, J. T. Pronk, A. J. R. Heck, and M. Slijper
Quantitative proteomics and transcriptomics of anaerobic and aerobic yeast cultures reveals post-transcriptional regulation of key cellular processes
Microbiology, November 1, 2007; 153(11): 3864 - 3878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
D. J. V. Beste, E. Laing, B. Bonde, C. Avignone-Rossa, M. E. Bushell, and J. J. McFadden
Transcriptomic Analysis Identifies Growth Rate Modulation as a Component of the Adaptation of Mycobacteria to Survival inside the Macrophage
J. Bacteriol., June 1, 2007; 189(11): 3969 - 3976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement