|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 4:819-826, 2005.
© 2005 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
,




From the
Division of Basic Science, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, ¶ Molecular Pathology Unit, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, || Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, West Perth, WA 6872 Australia, ** Phylogica, Ltd., West Perth, WA 6872 Australia, and 
Division of Basic Science, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Two-hybrid screening is a standard method used to identify and characterize protein-protein interactions and has become an integral component of many proteomic investigations. The two-hybrid system was initially developed using yeast as a host organism. However, bacterial two-hybrid systems have also become common laboratory tools and are preferred in some circumstances, although yeast and bacterial two-hybrid systems have never been directly compared. We describe here the development of a unified yeast and bacterial two-hybrid system in which a single bait expression plasmid is used in both organismal milieus. We use a series of leucine zipper fusion proteins of known affinities to compare interaction detection using both systems. Although both two-hybrid systems detected interactions within a comparable range of interaction affinities, each demonstrated unique advantages. The yeast system produced quantitative readout over a greater dynamic range than that observed with bacteria. However, the phenomenon of "autoactivation" by baits was less of a problem in the bacterial system than in the yeast. Both systems identified physiological interactors for a library screen with a cI-Ras test bait; however, non-identical interactors were obtained in yeast and bacterial screens. The ability to rapidly shift between yeast and bacterial systems provided by these new reagents should provide a marked advantage for two-hybrid investigations. In addition, the modified expression vectors we describe in this report should be useful for any application requiring facile expression of a protein of interest in both yeast and bacteria.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: 333 Cottman Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111. Tel.: 215-728-3885; Fax: 215-728-3616; E-mail: ig_serebriiskii{at}fccc.edu
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Velappan, D. Sblattero, L. Chasteen, P. Pavlik, and A. R.M. Bradbury Plasmid incompatibility: more compatible than previously thought? Protein Eng. Des. Sel., July 1, 2007; 20(7): 309 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |