HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: M500233-MCP200v1 5/3/497    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Glossary Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ulintz, P. J. Articles by Andrews, P. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ulintz, P. J. Articles by Andrews, P. C. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 5:497-509, 2006.
© 2006 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

---

Research

Improved Classification of Mass Spectrometry Database Search Results Using Newer Machine Learning Approaches^*

Peter J. Ulintz^,,¶, Ji Zhu^||, Zhaohui S. Qin^,** and Philip C. Andrews^,

From the National Resource for Proteomics and Pathways, Bioinformatics Program, ^|| Department of Statistics, and ^** Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

Manual analysis of mass spectrometry data is a current bottleneck in high throughput proteomics. In particular, the need to manually validate the results of mass spectrometry database searching algorithms can be prohibitively time-consuming. Development of software tools that attempt to quantify the confidence in the assignment of a protein or peptide identity to a mass spectrum is an area of active interest. We sought to extend work in this area by investigating the potential of recent machine learning algorithms to improve the accuracy of these approaches and as a flexible framework for accommodating new data features. Specifically we demonstrated the ability of boosting and random forest approaches to improve the discrimination of true hits from false positive identifications in the results of mass spectrometry database search engines compared with thresholding and other machine learning approaches. We accommodated additional attributes obtainable from database search results, including a factor addressing proton mobility. Performance was evaluated using publically available electrospray data and a new collection of MALDI data generated from purified human reference proteins.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Zhang, J. Ma, L. Dou, S. Wu, X. Qian, H. Xie, Y. Zhu, and F. He Bayesian Nonparametric Model for the Validation of Peptide Identification in Shotgun Proteomics Mol. Cell. Proteomics, March 1, 2009; 8(3): 547 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Brosch, S. Swamy, T. Hubbard, and J. Choudhary Comparison of Mascot and X!Tandem Performance for Low and High Accuracy Mass Spectrometry and the Development of an Adjusted Mascot Threshold Mol. Cell. Proteomics, May 1, 2008; 7(5): 962 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Stead, N. W. Paton, P. Missier, S. M. Embury, C. Hedeler, B. Jin, A. J. P. Brown, and A. Preece Information quality in proteomics Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2008; 9(2): 174 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Jaffe, D. R. Mani, K. C. Leptos, G. M. Church, M. A. Gillette, and S. A. Carr PEPPeR, a Platform for Experimental Proteomic Pattern Recognition Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2006; 5(10): 1927 - 1941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]