|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 6:439-450, 2007.
© 2007 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
From the a Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology and b The California Institute for Quantitative Biomedical Research, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158, e Department of Physiological Chemistry, Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3500 Utrecht, The Netherlands, g McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, h Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada, and k Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, California 94158
Defining protein complexes is critical to virtually all aspects of cell biology. Two recent affinity purification/mass spectrometry studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have vastly increased the available protein interaction data. The practical utility of such high throughput interaction sets, however, is substantially decreased by the presence of false positives. Here we created a novel probabilistic metric that takes advantage of the high density of these data, including both the presence and absence of individual associations, to provide a measure of the relative confidence of each potential protein-protein interaction. This analysis largely overcomes the noise inherent in high throughput immunoprecipitation experiments. For example, of the 12,122 binary interactions in the general repository of interaction data (BioGRID) derived from these two studies, we marked 7504 as being of substantially lower confidence. Additionally, applying our metric and a stringent cutoff we identified a set of 9074 interactions (including 4456 that were not among the 12,122 interactions) with accuracy comparable to that of conventional small scale methodologies. Finally we organized proteins into coherent multisubunit complexes using hierarchical clustering. This work thus provides a highly accurate physical interaction map of yeast in a format that is readily accessible to the biological community.
j Supported by a Sandler Family Fellowship. To whom correspondence may be addressed: University of California, 1700 4th St., San Francisco, CA 94143-2540. Tel.: 415-476-2980; Fax: 415-514-2073; E-mail: krogan{at}cmp.ucsf.edu
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Tarassov, V. Messier, C. R. Landry, S. Radinovic, M. M. S. Molina, I. Shames, Y. Malitskaya, J. Vogel, H. Bussey, and S. W. Michnick An in Vivo Map of the Yeast Protein Interactome Science, June 13, 2008; 320(5882): 1465 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Deng, R. H. Singer, and W. Gu Translation of ASH1 mRNA is repressed by Puf6p-Fun12p/eIF5B interaction and released by CK2 phosphorylation Genes & Dev., April 15, 2008; 22(8): 1037 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Decourty, C. Saveanu, K. Zemam, F. Hantraye, E. Frachon, J.-C. Rousselle, M. Fromont-Racine, and A. Jacquier Linking functionally related genes by sensitive and quantitative characterization of genetic interaction profiles PNAS, April 15, 2008; 105(15): 5821 - 5826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zhang, B.-H. Park, T. Karpinets, and N. F. Samatova From pull-down data to protein interaction networks and complexes with biological relevance Bioinformatics, April 1, 2008; 24(7): 979 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Beckham, A. Hilliker, A.-M. Cziko, A. Noueiry, M. Ramaswami, and R. Parker The DEAD-Box RNA Helicase Ded1p Affects and Accumulates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae P-Bodies Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2008; 19(3): 984 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Sardiu, Y. Cai, J. Jin, S. K. Swanson, R. C. Conaway, J. W. Conaway, L. Florens, and M. P. Washburn Probabilistic assembly of human protein interaction networks from label-free quantitative proteomics PNAS, February 5, 2008; 105(5): 1454 - 1459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Scholtens, T. Chiang, W. Huber, and R. Gentleman Estimating node degree in bait-prey graphs Bioinformatics, January 15, 2008; 24(2): 218 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Su, J. M. Peregrin-Alvarez, G. Butland, S. Phanse, V. Fong, A. Emili, and J. Parkinson Bacteriome.org an integrated protein interaction database for E. coli Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D632 - D636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang and L. Huang Identifying Dynamic Interactors of Protein Complexes by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2008; 7(1): 46 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Synowsky and A. J.R. Heck The yeast Ski complex is a hetero-tetramer Protein Sci., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 119 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. P. Davis, D. T. Barkan, N. Eswar, J. H. McKerrow, and A. Sali Host pathogen protein interactions predicted by comparative modeling Protein Sci., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2585 - 2596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. M. Bergeron and R. A. Bradshaw What Has Proteomics Accomplished? Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2007; 6(10): 1824 - 1826. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |