HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data All Versions of this Article: M600274-MCP200v1 6/8/1354    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Glossary Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Karp, N. A. Articles by Lilley, K. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Karp, N. A. Articles by Lilley, K. S. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 6:1354-1364, 2007.
© 2007 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

---

Research

Experimental and Statistical Considerations to Avoid False Conclusions in Proteomics Studies Using Differential In-gel Electrophoresis^*,S

Natasha A. Karp^,, Paul S. McCormick^¶,||, Matthew R. Russell^,** and Kathryn S. Lilley^,

From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Building O, Downing Site, Cambridge CB2 1QW, United Kingdom and ^¶ Department of Chemistry, University Chemical Laboratory, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom

In quantitative proteomics, the false discovery rate (FDR) can be defined as the number of false positives within statistically significant changes in expression. False positives accumulate during the simultaneous testing of expression changes across hundreds or thousands of protein or peptide species when univariate tests such as the Student's t test are used. Currently most researchers rely solely on the estimation of p values and a significance threshold, but this approach may result in false positives because it does not account for the multiple testing effect. For each species, a measure of significance in terms of the FDR can be calculated, producing individual q values. The q value maintains power by allowing the investigator to achieve an acceptable level of true or false positives within the calls of significance. The q value approach relies on the use of the correct statistical test for the experimental design. In this situation, a uniform p value frequency distribution when there are no differences in expression between two samples should be obtained. Here we report a bias in p value distribution in the case of a three-dye DIGE experiment where no changes in expression are occurring. The bias was shown to arise from correlation in the data from the use of a common internal standard. With a two-dye schema, where each sample has its own internal standard, such bias was removed, enabling the application of the q value to two different proteomics studies. In the case of the first study, we demonstrate that 80% of calls of significance by the more traditional method are false positives. In the second, we show that calculating the q value gives the user control over the FDR. These studies demonstrate the power and ease of use of the q value in correcting for multiple testing. This work also highlights the need for robust experimental design that includes the appropriate application of statistical procedures.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Sui, J. Zhang, T. L. Tan, C. B. Ching, and W. N. Chen Comparative Proteomics Analysis of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Incubated with S- and R-Enantiomers of Atenolol Using iTRAQ-coupled Two-dimensional LC-MS/MS Mol. Cell. Proteomics, June 1, 2008; 7(6): 1007 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]