MCP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/mcp.M700397-MCP200 on November 6, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M700397-MCP200v1
7/3/509    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Glossary
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tempst, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tempst, P.
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 7:509-518, 2008.
© 2008 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.


Research

A Sequence-specific Exopeptidase Activity Test (SSEAT) for "Functional" Biomarker Discovery*,S

Josep Villanueva{ddagger},§, Arpi Nazarian{ddagger}, Kevin Lawlor{ddagger}, San San Yi{ddagger}, Richard J. Robbins and Paul Tempst{ddagger},§,||

From the {ddagger} Protein Center and § Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065 and Department of Medicine, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030

One form of functional proteomics entails profiling of genuine activities, as opposed to surrogates of activity or active "states," in a complex biological matrix: for example, tracking enzyme-catalyzed changes, in real time, ranging from simple modifications to complex anabolic or catabolic reactions. Here we present a test to compare defined exoprotease activities within individual proteomes of two or more groups of biological samples. It tracks degradation of artificial substrates, under strictly controlled conditions, using semiautomated MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis of the resulting patterns. Each fragment is quantitated by comparison with double labeled, non-degradable internal standards (all-D-amino acid peptides) spiked into the samples at the same time as the substrates to reflect adsorptive and processing-related losses. The full array of metabolites is then quantitated (coefficients of variation of 6.3–14.3% over five replicates) and subjected to multivariate statistical analysis. Using this approach, we tested serum samples of 48 metastatic thyroid cancer patients and 48 healthy controls, with selected peptide substrates taken from earlier standard peptidomics screens (i.e. the "discovery" phase), and obtained class predictions with 94% sensitivity and 90% specificity without prior feature selection (24 features). The test all but eliminates reproducibility problems related to sample collection, storage, and handling as well as to possible variability in endogenous peptide precursor levels because of hemostatic alterations in cancer patients.


|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065. E-mail: p-tempst{at}mskcc.org







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.