Advertisement
MCP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/mcp.M800593-MCP200 on April 7, 2009.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M800593-MCP200v1
8/8/1765    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Glossary
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Li, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Li, X.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 8:1765-1776, 2009.
© 2009 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.


Research

Identification of Novel Serological Biomarkers for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using Escherichia coli Proteome Chip*,Formula

Chien-Sheng Chena,b,c, Sean Sullivanc,d,e, Troy Andersonc,f, Aik Choon Tanc,f,g, Philip J. Alexd, Steven R. Brantd, Carmen Cuffarie, Theodore M. Baylessd, Monica V. Talorh, C. Lynne Burekh, Huan Wangd, Richard Lid, Lisa Wu Dattad, Yuqiong Wud, Raimond L. Winslowf, Heng Zhua,i and Xuhang Lid,j

From the Departments of aPharmacology and Molecular Sciences,
ePediatrics,
gOncology, and
hPathology,
dThe Meyerhoff Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and Gastrointestinal Division, Department of Medicine, and
fInstitute of Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 and
bGraduate Institute of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, National Central University, Jhongli 32001, Taiwan

Specific antimicrobial antibodies present in the sera of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been proven to be valuable serological biomarkers for diagnosis/prognosis of the disease. Herein we describe the use of a whole Escherichia coli proteome microarray as a novel high throughput proteomics approach to screen and identify new serological biomarkers for IBD. Each protein array, which contains 4,256 E. coli K12 proteins, was screened using individual serum from healthy controls (n = 39) and clinically well characterized patients with IBD (66 Crohn disease (CD) and 29 ulcerative colitis (UC)). Proteins that could be recognized by serum antibodies were visualized and quantified using Cy3-labeled goat anti-human antibodies. Surprisingly significance analysis of microarrays identified a total of 417 E. coli proteins that were differentially recognized by serum antibodies between healthy controls and CD or UC. Among those, 169 proteins were identified as highly immunogenic in healthy controls, 186 proteins were identified as highly immunogenic in CD, and only 19 were identified as highly immunogenic in UC. Using a supervised learning algorithm (k-top scoring pairs), we identified two sets of serum antibodies that were novel biomarkers for specifically distinguishing CD from healthy controls (accuracy, 86 ± 4%; p < 0.01) and CD from UC (accuracy, 80 ± 2%; p < 0.01), respectively. The Set 1 antibodies recognized three pairs of E. coli proteins: Era versus YbaN, YhgN versus FocA, and GabT versus YcdG, and the Set 2 antibodies recognized YidX versus FrvX. The specificity and sensitivity of Set 1 antibodies were 81 ± 5 and 89 ± 3%, respectively, whereas those of Set 2 antibodies were 84 ± 1 and 70 ± 6%, respectively. Serum antibodies identified for distinguishing healthy controls versus UC were only marginal because their accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were 66 ± 5, 69 ± 5, and 61 ± 7%, respectively (p < 0.04). Taken together, we identified novel sets of serological biomarkers for diagnosis of CD versus healthy control and CD versus UC.


i To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology and HiT Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, BRB 333, 733 Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205. Tel.: 410-502-0878; Fax: 410-502-1872; E-mail: Heng.Zhu{at}jhmi.edu.

j To whom correspondence may be addressed: GI Division, Dept. of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 918 Ross Research Bldg., 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD 21205. Tel.: 443-287-4804; Fax: 410-955-9677; E-mail: xuhang{at}jhmi.edu.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement