|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on May 11, 2005
Systems Biology Group, Institut Pasteur, Paris, Paris 75015
Corresponding Author: benno{at}pasteur.fr
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics experiments, in combination with liquid chromatography-based separation, can be used to compare complex biological samples across multiple conditions. These comparisons are usually performed on the level of protein lists generated from individual experiments. Unfortunately, given the current technologies, these lists typically cover only a small fraction of the total protein content, which makes global comparisons extremely limited. Recently, approaches have been suggested that are built on the comparison of computationally built feature lists, instead of protein identifications. While these approaches promise to capture a bigger spectrum of the proteins present in a complex mixture, their success is strongly dependent on the correctness of the identified features, and the aligned retention times of these features across multiple experiments. In this experimental-computational study, we go one step further, and perform the comparisons directly on the signal level. First, signal maps are constructed, which associate the experimental signals across multiple experiments. Only then a feature detection algorithm uses this integrated information to identify those features that are discriminating or common across multiple experiments. At the core of our approach is a score function that faithfully recognizes mass spectra from similar peptide mixtures and an algorithm that produces an optimal alignment (time warping) of the liquid chromatography experiments on the basis of raw MS signal, making minimal assumptions on the underlying data. We provide experimental evidence that suggests uniqueness and correctness of the resulting signal maps, even on low-accuracy mass spectrometers. These maps can be employed for a variety of proteomics analyses. In this paper we illustrate the use of signal maps for the discovery of diagnostic biomarkers. An implementation of our algorithm is available on the CHAMS Web server at http://www.systemsbiology.fr/chams.
Revised on October 31, 2005
Accepted on November 3, 2005
Signal maps for mass spectrometry-based comparative proteomics
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C.-C. Tsou, C.-F. Tsai, Y.-H. Tsui, P.-R. Sudhir, Y.-T. Wang, Y.-J. Chen, J.-Y. Chen, T.-Y. Sung, and W.-L. Hsu IDEAL-Q, an Automated Tool for Label-free Quantitation Analysis Using an Efficient Peptide Alignment Approach and Spectral Data Validation Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2010; 9(1): 131 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. G. Kline, G. L. Finney, and C. C. Wu Quantitative strategies to fuel the merger of discovery and hypothesis-driven shotgun proteomics Briefings in Functional Genomics, March 1, 2009; 8(2): 114 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Prakash, B. Piening, J. Whiteaker, H. Zhang, S. A. Shaffer, D. Martin, L. Hohmann, K. Cooke, J. M. Olson, S. Hansen, et al. Assessing Bias in Experiment Design for Large Scale Mass Spectrometry-based Quantitative Proteomics Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2007; 6(10): 1741 - 1748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Bouyssie, A. G. de Peredo, E. Mouton, R. Albigot, L. Roussel, N. Ortega, C. Cayrol, O. Burlet-Schiltz, J.-P. Girard, and B. Monsarrat Mascot File Parsing and Quantification (MFPaQ), a New Software to Parse, Validate, and Quantify Proteomics Data Generated by ICAT and SILAC Mass Spectrometric Analyses: Application To the Proteomics Study of Membrane Proteins from Primary Human Endothelial Cells Mol. Cell. Proteomics, September 1, 2007; 6(9): 1621 - 1637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Lange, C. Gropl, O. Schulz-Trieglaff, A. Leinenbach, C. Huber, and K. Reinert A geometric approach for the alignment of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry data Bioinformatics, July 1, 2007; 23(13): i273 - i281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Listgarten, R. M. Neal, S. T. Roweis, P. Wong, and A. Emili Difference detection in LC-MS data for protein biomarker discovery Bioinformatics, January 15, 2007; 23(2): e198 - e204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. J. Skaggs, M. E. Gorre, A. Ryvkin, M. R. Burgess, Y. Xie, Y. Han, E. Komisopoulou, L. M. Brown, J. A. Loo, E. M. Landaw, et al. Phosphorylation of the ATP-binding loop directs oncogenicity of drug-resistant BCR-ABL mutants PNAS, December 19, 2006; 103(51): 19466 - 19471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Jaffe, D. R. Mani, K. C. Leptos, G. M. Church, M. A. Gillette, and S. A. Carr PEPPeR, a Platform for Experimental Proteomic Pattern Recognition Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2006; 5(10): 1927 - 1941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q. C. Ru, L. A. Zhu, J. Silberman, and C. D. Shriver Label-free Semiquantitative Peptide Feature Profiling of Human Breast Cancer and Breast Disease Sera via Two-dimensional Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Mol. Cell. Proteomics, June 1, 2006; 5(6): 1095 - 1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |