MCP Tips for better browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M500233-MCP200v1
5/3/497    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Glossary
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ulintz, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ulintz, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on July 27, 2005
Revised on November 10, 2005
Accepted on November 30, 2005

Improved classification of mass spectrometry database search results using newer machine learning approaches

Peter J. Ulintz, Ji Zhu, Zhaohui S. Qin, and Philip C. Andrews

Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109

Corresponding Author: pulintz{at}umich.edu

Manual analysis of mass spectrometry data is a current bottleneck in high-throughput proteomics. In particular, the need to manually validate the results of mass spectrometry database searching algorithms can be prohibitively time-consuming. Development of software tools that attempt to quantify the confidence in the assignment of a protein or peptide identity to a mass spectrum is an area of active interest. We seek to extend work in this area by investigating the potential of recent machine learning algorithms to improve the accuracy of these approaches, and as a flexible framework for accommodating new data features. Specifically, we demonstrate the ability of boosting and random forest approaches to improve the discrimination of true hits from false positive identifications in the results of mass spectrometry database search engines, compared to thresholding and other machine learning approaches. We accommodate additional attributes obtainable from database search results, including a factor addressing proton mobility. Performance is evaluated using publically available electrospray data and a new collection of MALDI data generated from purified human reference proteins.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
M. Brosch, S. Swamy, T. Hubbard, and J. Choudhary
Comparison of Mascot and X!Tandem Performance for Low and High Accuracy Mass Spectrometry and the Development of an Adjusted Mascot Threshold
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, May 1, 2008; 7(5): 962 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
D. A. Stead, N. W. Paton, P. Missier, S. M. Embury, C. Hedeler, B. Jin, A. J. P. Brown, and A. Preece
Information quality in proteomics
Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2008; 9(2): 174 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
J. D. Jaffe, D. R. Mani, K. C. Leptos, G. M. Church, M. A. Gillette, and S. A. Carr
PEPPeR, a Platform for Experimental Proteomic Pattern Recognition
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2006; 5(10): 1927 - 1941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.