|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on September 14, 2005
Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4560
Corresponding Author: lanhuang{at}uci.edu
We have developed an integrated proteomics approach to decipher in vivo protein-protein interactions and applied this strategy to globally map the 26S proteasome interaction network in yeast. We have termed this approach QTAX for quantitative analysis of tandem affinity purified in vivo cross-linked (X) protein complexes. For this work, in vivo formaldehyde cross-linking was employed to freeze both stable and transient interactions occurring in intact cells prior to lysis. To isolate cross-linked protein complexes with high purification efficiency under fully denaturing conditions, a new tandem affinity tag consisting of a hexahistidine sequence and an in vivo biotinylation signal was adopted for affinity-based purification. Tandem-affinity purification after in vivo cross-linking was combined with tandem mass spectrometry coupled with a quantitative SILAC strategy to carry out unambiguous protein identification and quantification of specific protein interactions. Using this method, we have captured and identified the full composition of yeast 26S proteasome complex as well as the two known ubiquitin receptors, Rad23 and Dsk2. Quantitative mass spectrometry analysis allowed us to distinguish specific proteasome interacting proteins (PIPs) from background proteins and led to the identification of a total of 64 potential PIPs, of which 42 are novel interactions. Among the 64 putative specific PIPs, there are ubiquitin pathway components, ubiquitinated substrates, chaperones, and transcription and translation regulators, demonstrating the efficacy of the developed approach in capturing in vivo protein interactions. The method offers an advanced technical approach to elucidate the proteasomes dynamic protein interaction networks, and can find a wide range of applications in the studies of other macromolecular protein complex interaction networks.
Revised on October 27, 2005
Accepted on November 10, 2005
An integrated mass spectrometry-based proteomics approach -QTAX to decipher the 26S proteasome interacting network
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Doucet, G. S. Butler, D. Rodriguez, A. Prudova, and C. M. Overall Metadegradomics: Toward in Vivo Quantitative Degradomics of Proteolytic Post-translational Modifications of the Cancer Proteome Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2008; 7(10): 1925 - 1951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Guerrero, T. Milenkovic, N. Przulj, P. Kaiser, and L. Huang Characterization of the proteasome interaction network using a QTAX-based tag-team strategy and protein interaction network analysis PNAS, September 9, 2008; 105(36): 13333 - 13338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang and L. Huang Identifying Dynamic Interactors of Protein Complexes by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2008; 7(1): 46 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Tardiff, K. C. Abruzzi, and M. Rosbash Protein characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase II after in vivo cross-linking PNAS, December 11, 2007; 104(50): 19948 - 19953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Friedrich, M. Cui, J. B. Hernandez, B. M. Weist, H.-M. Andersen, X. Zhang, L. Huang, and C. M. Walsh Modulation of DRAK2 Autophosphorylation by Antigen Receptor Signaling in Primary Lymphocytes J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 4573 - 4584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Tagwerker, K. Flick, M. Cui, C. Guerrero, Y. Dou, B. Auer, P. Baldi, L. Huang, and P. Kaiser A Tandem Affinity Tag for Two-step Purification under Fully Denaturing Conditions: Application in Ubiquitin Profiling and Protein Complex Identification Combined with in vivoCross-Linking Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2006; 5(4): 737 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |