MCP Thermo Scientific TMT Isobaric Mass Tagging Kits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M700165-MCP200v1
6/8/1291    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Glossary
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turck, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Yates, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turck, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Yates, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on April 12, 2007
Revised on May 17, 2007
Accepted on May 17, 2007

ABRF-PRG2006 study: Relative protein qQuantitation

Christoph W. Turck, Arnold M. Falick, Jeffrey A. Kowalak, William S. Lane, Kathryn S. Lilley, Brett S. Phinney, Susan T. Weintraub, H. Eva Witkowska, and Nathan A. Yates

Proteomics and Biomarkers, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich D-80804

Corresponding Author: turck{at}mpipsykl.mpg.de

The determination of differences in relative protein abundance is a critical aspect of proteomics research that is increasingly employed to answer diverse biological questions. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) Proteomics Research Group (PRG) 2006 study was a quantitative proteomics project in which the aim was to determine the identity and the relative amounts of eight proteins in two mixtures. There are numerous methodologies available to study the relative abundance of proteins between samples, but to date, there are few examples of studies that have compared these different approaches. For the 2006 PRG study, there were 52 participants who used a wide variety of gel electrophoresis-, HPLC- and mass spectrometry-based methods for relative quantitation. The quantitative data arising from this study were evaluated along with several other experimental details relevant to the methodologies employed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
J. J. Thelen and S. C. Peck
Quantitative Proteomics in Plants: Choices in Abundance
PLANT CELL, November 1, 2007; 19(11): 3339 - 3346.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.