Advertisement
MCP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2009.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M800099-MCP200v1
8/4/846    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Glossary
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karabacak, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Agar, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karabacak, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Agar, J. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on March 6, 2008
Revised on December 8, 2008
Accepted on December 15, 2008

Sensitive and specific identification of wild-type and variant proteins from 8 to 669 kDa using top-down mass spectrometry

Nezihi Murat Karabacak, Long Li, Ashutosh Tiwari, Lawrence J. Hayward, Pengyu Hong, Michael L. Easterling, and Jeffrey N. Agar

Chemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454

Corresponding Author: agar{at}brandeis.edu

Top-down and bottom-up mass spectrometry methods can generate gas phase fragments and use these to identify proteins. Top down methods, in addition, can provide the mass of the protein itself and therefore additional structural information. Despite top-down’s conceptual advantage, the market share advantage belongs to bottom-up methods as a result of their more robust sample preparation, fragmentation, and data processing methods. Here we report improved fragmentation and data processing methods for top-down mass spectrometry. Specifically, we report the use of funnel-skimmer dissociation, a variation of nozzle-skimmer dissociation, and compare its performance to electron capture dissociation. We also debut BIG Mascot, an extended version of Mascot with incorporated top-down MS2 search ability, and the first search engine that can perform both bottom-up and top-down searches. Using BIG Mascot, we demonstrate the ability to identify proteins: 1) using only intact protein MS1, 2) using only MS2, and 3) using the combination of MS1 and MS2. We correctly identify proteins with a wide range of masses, including thirteen amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-associated variants of the protein Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase, and extend the upper mass limit of top-down protein identification to 669 kDa by identifying thyroglobulin.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement