|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 2:1205-1216, 2003.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-ketoacid dehydrogenase and prohibitin 2. The association of several of these proteins with mtTFA-containing mtDNA nucleoids was confirmed by immunoprecipitation.
-proteobacterial partner in this fusion (1). Presumably, a process of directional transfer of genes from mitochondria to the nucleus led to the progressive loss of genes from the mitochondrial genome to the nucleus, leaving only a small set of genes in contemporary mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA).1 Relatively little is known of the packaging of animal mtDNA, in contrast to the wealth of information on the protein packaging of nuclear DNA in chromatin. The endosymbiotic hypothesis suggests that the DNA-protein complexes in mitochondria may resemble those in their bacterial ancestors. While eubacteria do not package their DNA in nucleosomes, they do contain abundant basic proteins like HU and INT that compact the DNA and exert a significant influence on gene expression (2).
mtDNA is associated with at least two basic proteins with clear bacterial homologs. The HMG-box protein, mitochondrial transcription factor A (mtTFA), which has been conserved from yeast to humans, is structurally related the bacterial HU protein. Indeed, the yeast mtTFA and Escherichia coli HU proteins can genetically substitute for one another (3). mtTFA plays a role as a transcription factor in vertebrates (46), but apparently not in yeast (7). Thus, it appears that the essential role that mtTFA plays in yeast mtDNA maintenance is as an architectural DNA binding protein, which accounts for its relative abundance (8). mtTFA is remarkably abundant in mitochondria of Xenopus oocytes and human HeLa cells, with hundreds of copies of the protein per mtDNA (5, 911). A second mtDNA binding protein that is relatively well-characterized is mitochondrial single-stranded DNA binding protein (mtSSB) (1214). mtSSB is a tetramer of
16-kDa subunits with DNA binding characteristics and structure closely related to those of E. coli SSB (1517). The helicase, twinkle, has also recently been shown to reside in the mtDNA nucleoid (18).
While mtTFA and mtSSB appear to be universal mtDNA binding proteins, the structure of mtDNA-protein complexes, or nucleoids, remains poorly understood. Early observations of mtDNA extruded from osmotically ruptured mitochondria revealed circular DNA fibers apparently attached to membrane fragments (19). Using electron microscopy, Albring et al. (20) later identified an apparent sequence-specific attachment of mtDNA to the inner mitochondrial membrane but did not identify a protein anchor responsible for this association. Such sequence-specific binding was not observed by Pinon et al. (21) in their electron microscopic study of Xenopus mtDNA-protein complexes.
Studies of mtDNA nucleoprotein structure have been hampered by the fact that mtDNA constitutes less than 1% of the total DNA in most somatic cells. Various investigators using different tissue sources and different methods have failed to define a consistent set of protein components of mtDNA nucleoids. The notion that mtDNA was attached to the inner mitochondrial membrane was supported by the similar membrane association of the bacterial chromosome and by biochemical studies of complexes isolated from sarkosyl lysates of rat liver mitochondria (22). However, in a later publication, Van Tuyle and McPherson (23), using a very different high salt extraction procedure to isolate rat liver mtDNA-protein complexes, did not find a great similarity between nucleoid proteins and inner membrane proteins. Barat et al. (24) suggested that the set of proteins associated with their preparations of Xenopus mtDNA nucleoids resembled proteins of the inner mitochondrial membrane. To date, no inner membrane proteins have been positively identified in mtDNA nucleoids.
The composition of mtDNA nucleoids has received more attention in yeast (25). Newman et al. (26) reported purification of a complex containing yeast mtTFA (Abf2p) along with a limited set of polypeptides. Continued experimentation in the Butow laboratory involving sequencing of polypeptides cross-linked to mtDNA identified some of these novel associated proteins as mitochondrial hsp60 and the E2 subunit of yeast
-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, KGD2 (27). Interestingly, Sato et al. (28) recently identified KGD2 in their yeast nucleoid preparations as well. Kaufman et al. (27) confirmed that deletion of yeast KGD2 in an abf2-deficient strain increases the instability of the mtDNA genome.
Recent advances in the sensitivity and efficiency of protein sequencing technology have made it possible to reinvestigate the set of proteins associated with mtDNA in higher organisms. We employed mtTFA as a marker to follow nucleoids during purification from Xenopus oocyte mitochondria by adapting methods developed by Barat et al. (24). This approach employs both a glycerol gradient sizing step and a buoyant separation in nonionic metrizamide gradients. We found that the set of proteins associated with mtDNA and the apparent sedimentation properties and buoyant density of nucleoids depends critically on the extent of treatment with nonionic detergents during lysis of mitochondria. The proteins in the crude nucleoid fraction appear to reside in a relatively detergent-resistant complex, because prolonged detergent treatment is required to release less-tightly bound proteins. We have observed a set of proteins that remains persistently associated with mtDNA following two rounds of treatment with Triton X-100. The persistent components of the mtDNA nucleoid include adenine nucleotide translocator, prohibitin2, and the E2 subunits of two large dehydrogenase complexes, pyruvate dehydrogenase and branched chain keto acid dehydrogenase. The novel association of these proteins with the mtDNA nucleoid was confirmed by their detection in mtDNA nucleoids immunoprecipitated with antibodies directed against mtTFA.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Purification of Xenopus Oocyte Mitochondria
All steps in the purification of mitochondria and DNA-protein complexes were conducted at 4 °C without freezing of the sample at intermediate steps. Ovaries (2530 g) were excised from two mature Xenopus laevis females, washed extensively in ice-cold 0.5x SSC, and homogenized in 50 ml of MSH buffer (0.21 M mannitol, 0.07 M sucrose, 20 mM HEPES, pH 8, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)). This and all buffers contained a protease inhibitor mix including 2 mM benzamidine HCl, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µM pepstatin, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, and 0.2 µg/ml L-trans-epoxysuccinyl-leucylamide-(4-guanido)-butane (E-64)). Yolk and pigment granules were pelleted by two rounds of centrifugation at 1000 x g in a Sorvall SS34 rotor. Mitochondria were pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000 x g in the SS34 rotor and resuspended in 40 ml of MSH buffer from the light-colored layer of the pellet, leaving the black pigment pellet as undisturbed as possible. Mitochondria were repelleted under the same conditions and resuspended in 30 ml of KMHED buffer (125 mM KCl, 7 mM MgCl2, 30 mM HEPES, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT). This salt wash was intended to reduce contamination by material adherent to the mitochondrial outer membranes. The resuspended mitochondria were layered over four preformed sucrose step gradients containing 15 ml of 1 M sucrose over 12 ml of 1.5 M sucrose in SW28 Ultraclear (Beckman, Fullerton, CA) centrifuge tubes. All sucrose gradient solutions were prepared with a general buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 8, 2 mM DTT, 2 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitors as described above. Gradients were spun at 92,600 x g in the SW28 rotor for 30 min to sediment mitochondria to the 1 M/1.5 M sucrose interface. The solution above this layer was removed by suction, and the mitochondrial layer was gently removed with a Pasteur pipette, leaving the 1.5 M sucrose layer behind. Mitochondria were diluted with three volumes of 0.5x MSH buffer and repelleted as described above. Mitochondria were resuspended in 6 ml of 1.25x lysis buffer (1x lysis buffer is 20 mM HEPES, pH 8, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT). A sample was removed for determination of the protein concentration, which generally varied from 6 to 7 mg/ml in the Bradford Assay (BioRad, Hercules, CA) or Advanced Protein Assay (Cytoskeleton, Denver, CO) using BSA as a standard. One-fifth volume of 6% Triton X-100 (Surfact-Amps; Pierce, Rockford, IL) was added to adjust the solution to 1.2% Triton X-100. The suspension was inverted gently several times and was observed to clarify and darken upon addition of detergent. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 2000 x g in a Sorvall RT6000 bench top centrifuge.
Purification of mtDNA Nucleoids
A total of 700 µl of the 1.2% Triton X-100 lysate was layered onto each of several 1540% glycerol gradients poured with a gradient maker over a 500-µl pad of 30% glycerol/30% metrizamide. All glycerol gradient solutions contained 30 mM HEPES, pH 8, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 20 mM NaCl, and protease inhibitors as above. Following centrifugation at 186,000 x g in an SW41 rotor for 2 h, 700-µl fractions were collected. In the initial experiments, Triton X-100 was not included in the glycerol gradients, resulting in association of additional inner membrane proteins with nucleoids as discussed in the text. In later experiments, preformed glycerol gradients contained 0.2% Triton X-100. mtDNA was detected in gradient fractions by mixing 50 µl of gradient fractions with 150 µl of a 1:300 dilution of Picogreen dye (Molecular Probes) in the wells of a 96-well microtiter dish. Fluorescence was detected using a Fluorimager 595 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) with excitation at 488 nm and a 530-nm emission filter. As noted in "Results," mtDNA was found in a broad zone in the center of the gradient and in a tight layer at the interface between the gradient and the 30% metrizamide/30% glycerol pad. To confirm that the peak of Picogreen fluorescence in gradient fractions represented mtDNA, 100 µl samples of gradient fractions were mixed with 300 µl of 0.5 M NaAc in TE (10 mM Tris, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA) containing 10 µg of glycogen carrier, extracted with phenol-CHCl3, ethanol precipitated and subjected to electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels. Gels were stained either with ethidium bromide (Calbiochem) or Vistra green (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and imaged with a Fluorimager 595 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). In some cases, the identity of the mtDNA species was confirmed by transfer of DNA to a Nytran+ filter and hybridization with a probe derived from pXlm32 (29).
Fractions containing mtDNA at the 30% metrizamide/30% glycerol pad or in the center of the glycerol gradient were layered over preformed 2550% metrizamide (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) gradients containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 8, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, and 10 mM NaCl. Unless indicated otherwise, the glycerol gradient fractions were retreated with 0.5% Triton X-100 before loading on the metrizamide gradient. Gradients were spun for 16 h at 186,000 x g in an SW41 rotor and collected into 600-µl fractions. DNA was detected by Picogreen fluorescence or by agarose gel electrophoresis as described above. In later experiments, the metrizamide gradients contained 0.2% Triton X-100. In the experiment shown in Fig. 6, the metrizamide gradient fractions containing mtDNA nucleoids were pooled, diluted 3-fold with 20 mM HEPES, pH 8, 2 mM DTT, 2 mM EDTA, and layered over a 0.5-ml pad of 50% metrizamide in an SW60Ti centrifuge tube. Samples were centrifuged at 257,000 x g for 3 h and the concentrated mtDNA nucleoids were collected from the pad.
|
Silver stained proteins selected for sequencing were excised from the gel and destained (32). Proteins were digested with sequencing grade trypsin in situ (33). Peptides recovered from the gel pieces were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) using a Voyager DE-Str or by liquid chromatography (LC) tandem MS (MS/MS) using a ThermoFinnigan LCQ ion trap mass spectrometer (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA). Proteins were identified by automated matching of ion patterns to a library of protein sequences using SEQUEST software (34) or SONAR (35). A number of proteins were identified with both MS methods, but the data reported here refer to hits observed with LC-MS/MS.
Immunopurification of Nucleoids
A magnetic bead-based affinity column with covalently bound antibodies directed against mtTFA was used to immunopurify nucleoids essentially as described by Alam et al. (11). Immunoglobulins were prepared from the serum of a rabbit immunized with Xenopus mtTFA by protein A Sepharose chromatography. Following desalting, the antibodies were coupled to magnetic tosylactivated M-280 Dynabeads (Dynal, Oslo, Norway) in 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, under conditions recommended by the manufacturer. Approximately 5 x 108 anti-mtTFA-coated beads were incubated with 0.6 ml of a glycerol gradient fraction enriched in mtDNA nucleoids in glycerol gradient buffer containing 70 mM NaCl and 0.5% Triton X-100. Following a 90-min binding, the beads were collected on a magnet, and the unbound proteins were removed as a supernatant fraction. The column was washed three times by resuspension of the beads in buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 70 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 0.5% Triton X-100. Bound proteins were eluted with 10 M urea, 50 mM glycine, pH 2.4, containing 0.05% sarkosyl.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60% of input mtDNA bound the column. The column was washed three times with buffer containing 70 mM NaCl and 0.5% Triton X-100, and bound proteins were eluted with a buffer containing 10 M urea as described under "Experimental Procedures." Equal fractions of the unbound supernatant, the wash fraction, and the final eluate were subjected to electrophoresis, blotted, and probed with antibodies directed against proteins of interest. As can be seen in Fig. 8, mtTFA, PDC-E2, PHB, and ANT were detected in the urea eluate, while porin was principally detected in the unbound and wash fractions, providing a negative control. We conclude that ANT, PDC-E2, PHB, and ANT are specifically associated with the mtTFA-mtDNA nucleoid.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Identification of Novel Proteins in mtDNA Nucleoids
We began these experiments with the goal of identifying novel mtDNA binding proteins that could anchor the nucleoid to the mitochondrial inner membrane. Our protein sequencing identified several proteins that could conceivably serve in this role. These will be discussed individually below. However, it is important to point out some common attributes shared by the novel proteins we observed in nucleoid preparations. First, they are all remarkably abundant and only a minor fraction of each protein is retained in mtDNA nucleoids. Second, each of the four novel mtDNA nucleoid proteins reported here have other well-characterized roles in mitochondria. Unfortunately, this implies that it will be difficult to use genetic methods to study these associations because all of the proteins we have identified are likely to be required for their critical roles in mitochondrial function. Third, in each case, the nature of the interaction of these proteins with mtDNA is uncertain. We have not determined whether any of these proteins has direct DNA binding activity or may instead associate with the mtDNA through interactions with other authentic mtDNA binding proteins such as mtTFA. These proteins are found in large complexes that could help account for the proteinaceous "knob" identified in association with mtDNA by Albring et al. (20). We have no data addressing the issue of whether the proteins we have observed bind mtDNA in a sequence-specific manner as suggested by Albring et al. (20). Finally, each of the novel mtDNA nucleoid proteins identified here present tantalizing connections to the general issue of the inheritance and/or stability of mtDNA, as summarized below.
The fact that the novel mtDNA nucleoid proteins we have identified are abundant may suggest that their association with mtDNA is artifactual. It is indeed difficult to rule out this possibility because the mitochondrial matrix compartment has an extraordinarily high protein concentration, estimated at
500 mg/ml, and no point in the matrix is generally more than 200 Å away from inner membrane (38, 39). Given this potential complexity, two considerations suggest that our observation of novel proteins in mtDNA nucleoids is significant. First, the retention of known abundant mtDNA binding proteins, mtTFA and mtSSB, in the nucleoids provides a valuable positive control. Second, the proteins retained in these complexes are relatively tightly associated because other abundant proteins in the crude nucleoid preparation, such as ATPase subunits and porin, are effectively removed by more extensive washing of the complexes with nonionic detergents. Finally, we have used two very different procedures, buoyant density gradient centrifugation and immunoprecipitation, to show that ANT, PDC-E2, and PHB are retained in association with mtDNA nucleoids under conditions in which more indirectly associated membrane proteins such as porin are removed.
Adenine Nucleotide Translocator 1
We have consistently observed that ANT1 is physically associated with mtDNA, having sequenced this protein in four independent nucleoid preparations. We typically obtain better sequence coverage for this protein than for the mtTFA, which comigrates with it on our SDS-polyacrylamide gels. ANT1 plays a major role in exchanging ADP for ATP at the mitochondrial inner membrane. Recently, Kaukonen et al. (40) have shown that the ANT1 gene is mutated in some patients with a genetic disorder leading to multiple mtDNA deletions, autosomal dominant progressive external opthalmoplegia (AD-PEO). Because ANT1 is important for the exchange of adenine nucleotides, it has been suggested that this mutation affects mtDNA replication through an indirect effect on nucleotide pools. Mice lacking the heart/muscle-specific Ant1 also accumulate tissue-specific deletions in mtDNA, which has been thought to be secondary to increased oxidative stress (41). The observation that ANT1 is in physical contact with mtDNA nucleoids raises the novel possibility that mutations may interfere with mtDNA replication in a manner that induces the multiple deletions observed in AD-PEO patients. ANT is a small protein with six membrane-spanning regions, yet has a very basic pI of 9.78, with clusters of positively charged residues exposed to the mitochondrial matrix (42). Interestingly, a primary sequence similarity between ANT and the DNA binding domain of estrogen receptor has been reported (43).
ANT is one of a large family of metabolite transporters in the mitochondrial membrane. Genetic studies in yeast have suggested that other members of this family, namely Yhm2p and Rim2p, may contribute to mtDNA maintenance. Cho et al. (44) showed that the YHM2 gene is a multicopy suppressor of a null mutant of ABF2, the yeast mtTFA. Interestingly, another suppressor of ABF2 deficiency is the ILV5 gene, which plays a role in branched chain amino acid metabolism, providing a potential link to a second of our novel proteins, BCKD-E2. Rim2p is a second member of the family of mitochondrial transporters that has a role in mtDNA maintenance in yeast. VanDyck et al. (45) showed that overexpression of the RIM2/MRS12 gene product can suppress the mtDNA loss phenotype observed in cells deficient in the Pif1 DNA helicase.
Dihydrolipoyl Acetyl- and Acyl-Transferases
Our observation that both the E2 subunits of pyruvate dehydrogenase and branched chain keto acid dehydrogenase are associated in mtDNA nucleoids provides an interesting parallel to the work summarized in the introduction showing that the E2 subunit of
-keto glutarate dehydrogenase is associated with the yeast mtDNA nucleoid (27, 28). These three massive enzyme complexes each contain either 24 or 60 E2 subunits in a core surrounded by E1 subunits that provide the substrate specificity for their respective 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase activities and by a common E3 subunit that regenerates the lipoic acid carrier. In each case, the E2 subunit employs a mobile lipoyl-conjugated domain to transfer the product of decarboxylation from the E1 subunit to acetyl CoA. All three complexes utilize a common E3 subunit to regenerate the E2 carrier (46). It is surely not coincidental that these E2 subunits are found in mtDNA nucleoids from highly divergent organisms and that disruption of the yeast KGD2 gene influences mtDNA stability. The nature of the association of these proteins with mtDNA nucleoids is presently obscure. It is noteworthy that binding of PDC-E2 proteins to DNA has been reported in two bacterial systems as well (47, 48).
It is striking that we have not seen other subunits of pyruvate dehydrogenase or branched chain keto acid dehydrogenase in nucleoid preparations. This implies that the E2 subunits of these large complexes are selectively isolated with mtDNA nucleoids without apparent association with the E1, E3, or other minor components of the large dehydrogenase complexes. The E2 subunits associate tightly in trimers stabilized by an extensive buried surface (49). These trimers are, in turn, assembled less tightly at the vertices of either a cube or a dodecahedron to form the 24- or 60-subunit core of a dehydrogenase. If mtDNA nucleoids associated with the exterior surface of intact pyruvate dehydrogenase, for example, one would expect that the principle contacts would be with the E1
2ß2 tetramers surrounding the E2 core, and that these subunits would tend to block access to the E2 subunits. Following importation into mitochondria, the E2 subunits are modified by addition of the lipoic acid cofactor to an exposed lysine residue in a flexible N-terminal domain. It is tempting to suggest that mtDNA nucleoids interact with E2 subunits selectively, not necessarily with the fully assembled complex. The lipoic acid cofactor covalently linked to the E2 subunits could provide an association with the mitochondrial inner membrane in much the same way that farnesylation helps anchor proteins to membranes. Stanley et al. (50) have suggested that the 2-oxo acid dehydrogenases may be associated with the inner membrane.
The E2 subunit of pyruvate dehydrogenase has additional clinical importance as an antigen in the autoimmune disease biliary cirrhosis (51). The E2 subunits of alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase and branched chain amino acid dehydrogenase can also elicit this autoimmune disorder (52). In other autoimmune disorders, such as systemic lupus erythematosis, nucleic acid binding proteins are targeted by the immune system. It is tempting to speculate that the association of these E2 subunits with mtDNA may factor in their inappropriate presentation to the immune system as auto-antigens.
Prohibitin 2
Several highly significant peptide hits were observed for the larger of two prohibitin proteins, establishing PHB2 as a component of the mtDNA nucleoid. PHB1 and PHB2 are associated in a large chaperone-like complex bound to the inner membrane though intrinsic transmembrane domains in PHB2. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments have shown that neither PHB1 not PHB2 is found without its binding partner (53). After we observed PHB2 sequences in our nucleoid preparation, we used immunoblotting to detect PHB1 among nucleoid proteins at a position migrating slightly faster than mtTFA (Fig. 7).
Several possible functions have been ascribed to the prohibitin complex in the scientific literature. A recent review clearly establishes its major role as a chaperone-like regulator of the AAA protease in the mitochondrial matrix that assists in the assembly of inner membrane complexes (54). The prohibitin complex is thought to help fold nascent membrane proteins synthesized within mitochondria. Because transcription and translation occur in the same intra-mitochondrial compartment, the association of PHB with mtDNA nucleoids may result from coupled transcription, translation, and folding of nascent membrane proteins. Alternatively, prohibitin may bind to dihydrolipoyl acetyl- and acyltransferase (E2) subunits of dehydrogenases that are in the process of being assembled into higher molecular mass complexes. This would help to account for the presence of both the E2 proteins and prohibitin in the mtDNA nucleoids. While these large dehydrogenase complexes are capable of self-assembly in vitro, prohibitin may participate in the assembly process in vivo. Prohibitin has been shown to influence cellular senescence (53, 55) and mitochondrial inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (56). The involvement of mtDNA mutations in aging is a subject of active research, and it is a high priority to understand the mechanisms whereby segregation and amplification of mutant mtDNAs permits the accumulation of high levels of mutant mtDNA genomes in tissues affected by mitochondrial disorders. Further experiments will be required to determine whether the presence of prohibitin in association with the mtDNA nucleoid is important to these processes.
Implications for mtDNA-Protein Dynamics
Our results show that mtDNA binds tightly to a limited number of proteins that help anchor it to the mitochondrial inner membrane. The identity of one of these as ANT1 establishes that mtDNA is attached to the membrane near the major pore involved in adenine nucleotide exchange and in the loss of membrane potential during apoptosis. Whether this association has implications with regard to mtDNA dynamics during apoptosis will be an interesting subject for future research. The three classes of novel proteins we have identified, ANT1, 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase E2 subunits, and prohibitin, all have potentially interesting clinical implications in mitochondrial diseases and aging. Because mitochondria undergo continuous fusion and fission events, we suggest that the association of mtDNA with key metabolic proteins and with the ANT pore complex may prevent the mtDNA from becoming segregated in nonfunctional submitochondrial complexes.
A final interesting aspect of our results is that, with the exception of abundant proteins mtTFA and mtSSB, we did not detect proteins known to be involved in mtDNA replication and transcription. These regulatory proteins may be lost from the nucleoids during purification or may be present at levels below our current detection limits. Our use of Xenopus oocytes as the source for nucleoid purification may also be an important variable because many of the mtDNA genomes in our preparation may be derived from mature oocytes and may be relatively inactive in replication and transcription. Efforts are underway to extend the methods employed in this study to other cell systems.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published, MCP Papers in Press, September 26, 2003, DOI 10.1074/mcp.M300035-MCP200
1 The abbreviations used are: mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; mtTFA, mitochondrial transcription factor A; mtSSB, mitochondrial single-stranded DNA binding protein; DTT, dithiothreitol; PVDF, polyvinyldifluoridine; ANT, adenine nucleotide translocator; PDC-E2, E2 subunit of pyruvate decarboxylase; BCKD-E2, E2 subunit of branched chain keto-acid dehydrogenase; PHB, prohibitin; VDAC, voltage-dependent anion channel or porin; COX1, subunit 1 of cytochrome oxidase; AD-PEO, autosomal dominant progressive external opthalmoplegia; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy. ![]()
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Research Grants ES04068, GM29681, and ES012039 (to D. F. B.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. ![]()
¶ Current address: University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143. ![]()
** Current address: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030. ![]()
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Department of Pharmacological Sciences, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8651. Tel.: 631-444-3068; Fax: 631-444-3218; E-mail: dan{at}pharm.sunysb.edu.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
.
J. Biol. Chem.
271, 18939
18946This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Osman, C. Merkwirth, and T. Langer Prohibitins and the functional compartmentalization of mitochondrial membranes J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2009; 122(21): 3823 - 3830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sumitani, K. Kasashima, E. Ohta, D. Kang, and H. Endo Association of a Novel Mitochondrial Protein M19 with Mitochondrial Nucleoids J. Biochem., November 1, 2009; 146(5): 725 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Di Re, H. Sembongi, J. He, A. Reyes, T. Yasukawa, P. Martinsson, L. J. Bailey, S. Goffart, J. D. Boyd-Kirkup, T. S. Wong, et al. The accessory subunit of mitochondrial DNA polymerase {gamma} determines the DNA content of mitochondrial nucleoids in human cultured cells Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2009; 37(17): 5701 - 5713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kienhofer, D. J. F. Haussler, F. Ruckelshausen, E. Muessig, K. Weber, D. Pimentel, V. Ullrich, A. Burkle, and M. M. Bachschmid Association of mitochondrial antioxidant enzymes with mitochondrial DNA as integral nucleoid constituents FASEB J, July 1, 2009; 23(7): 2034 - 2044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Gangelhoff, P. S. Mungalachetty, J. C. Nix, and M. E. A. Churchill Structural analysis and DNA binding of the HMG domains of the human mitochondrial transcription factor A Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2009; 37(10): 3153 - 3164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Osman, M. Haag, C. Potting, J. Rodenfels, P. V. Dip, F. T. Wieland, B. Brugger, B. Westermann, and T. Langer The genetic interactome of prohibitins: coordinated control of cardiolipin and phosphatidylethanolamine by conserved regulators in mitochondria J. Cell Biol., February 23, 2009; 184(4): 583 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Wong, S. Rajagopalan, F. M. Townsley, S. M. Freund, M. Petrovich, D. Loakes, and A. R. Fersht Physical and functional interactions between human mitochondrial single-stranded DNA-binding protein and tumour suppressor p53 Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2009; 37(2): 568 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Iacovino, C. Granycome, H. Sembongi, M. Bokori-Brown, R. A. Butow, I. J. Holt, and J. M. Bateman The conserved translocase Tim17 prevents mitochondrial DNA loss Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 65 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Khidr, G. Wu, A. Davila, V. Procaccio, D. Wallace, and W.-H. Lee Role of SUV3 Helicase in Maintaining Mitochondrial Homeostasis in Human Cells J. Biol. Chem., October 3, 2008; 283(40): 27064 - 27073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ochsenreiter, S. Anderson, Z. A. Wood, and S. L. Hajduk Alternative RNA Editing Produces a Novel Protein Involved in Mitochondrial DNA Maintenance in Trypanosomes Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2008; 28(18): 5595 - 5604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kucej, B. Kucejova, R. Subramanian, X. J. Chen, and R. A. Butow Mitochondrial nucleoids undergo remodeling in response to metabolic cues J. Cell Sci., June 1, 2008; 121(11): 1861 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Scarpulla Transcriptional Paradigms in Mammalian Mitochondrial Biogenesis and Function Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 611 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-H. Chen, C. K. Suzuki, and S.-H. Wu Thermodynamic characterization of specific interactions between the human Lon protease and G-quartet DNA Nucleic Acids Res., March 27, 2008; 36(4): 1273 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Bogenhagen, D. Rousseau, and S. Burke The Layered Structure of Human Mitochondrial DNA Nucleoids J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3665 - 3675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. J. Chen, X. Wang, and R. A. Butow Yeast aconitase binds and provides metabolically coupled protection to mitochondrial DNA PNAS, August 21, 2007; 104(34): 13738 - 13743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lu, S. Yadav, P. G. Shah, T. Liu, B. Tian, S. Pukszta, N. Villaluna, E. Kutejova, C. S. Newlon, J. H. Santos, et al. Roles for the Human ATP-dependent Lon Protease in Mitochondrial DNA Maintenance J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2007; 282(24): 17363 - 17374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. He, C.-C. Mao, A. Reyes, H. Sembongi, M. Di Re, C. Granycome, A. B. Clippingdale, I. M. Fearnley, M. Harbour, A. J. Robinson, et al. The AAA+ protein ATAD3 has displacement loop binding properties and is involved in mitochondrial nucleoid organization J. Cell Biol., January 16, 2007; 176(2): 141 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kasashima, E. Ohta, Y. Kagawa, and H. Endo Mitochondrial Functions and Estrogen Receptor-dependent Nuclear Translocation of Pleiotropic Human Prohibitin 2 J. Biol. Chem., November 24, 2006; 281(47): 36401 - 36410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang and D. F. Bogenhagen Human Mitochondrial DNA Nucleoids Are Linked to Protein Folding Machinery and Metabolic Enzymes at the Mitochondrial Inner Membrane J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2006; 281(35): 25791 - 25802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Cheng, T. Kanki, A. Fukuoh, K. Ohgaki, R. Takeya, Y. Aoki, N. Hamasaki, and D. Kang PDIP38 Associates with Proteins Constituting the Mitochondrial DNA Nucleoid J. Biochem., December 1, 2005; 138(6): 673 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Bayona-Bafaluy, B. Blits, B. J. Battersby, E. A. Shoubridge, and C. T. Moraes Rapid directional shift of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in animal tissues by a mitochondrially targeted restriction endonuclease PNAS, October 4, 2005; 102(40): 14392 - 14397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Stuart, S. Mayard, K. Hashiguchi, N. C. Souza-Pinto, and V. A. Bohr Localization of mitochondrial DNA base excision repair to an inner membrane-associated particulate fraction Nucleic Acids Res., July 8, 2005; 33(12): 3722 - 3732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. J. Chen, X. Wang, B. A. Kaufman, and R. A. Butow Aconitase Couples Metabolic Regulation to Mitochondrial DNA Maintenance Science, February 4, 2005; 307(5710): 714 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Legros, F. Malka, P. Frachon, A. Lombes, and M. Rojo Organization and dynamics of human mitochondrial DNA J. Cell Sci., June 1, 2004; 117(13): 2653 - 2662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Ekstrand, M. Falkenberg, A. Rantanen, C. B. Park, M. Gaspari, K. Hultenby, P. Rustin, C. M. Gustafsson, and N.-G. Larsson Mitochondrial transcription factor A regulates mtDNA copy number in mammals Hum. Mol. Genet., May 1, 2004; 13(9): 935 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |