|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

From the Medical Research Council Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, The Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XY, United Kingdom
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
represents the extrinsic arm, subcomplex I
consists of subcomplex I
plus part of the membrane arm, and subcomplex Iß is another substantial part of the membrane arm. The intact complex and these three subcomplexes have been subjected to extensive reanalysis. Their subunits have been separated by three independent methods (one-dimensional SDS-PAGE, two-dimensional isoelectric focusing/SDS-PAGE, and reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)) and analyzed by tryptic peptide mass fingerprinting and tandem mass spectrometry. The masses of many of the intact subunits have also been measured by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and have provided valuable information about post-translational modifications. The presence of the known 35 nuclear encoded subunits in complex I has been confirmed, and four additional nuclear encoded subunits have been detected. Subunits B16.6, B14.7, and ESSS were discovered in the SDS-PAGE analysis of subcomplex I
, in the two-dimensional gel analysis of the intact complex, and in the HPLC analysis of subcomplex Iß, respectively. Despite many attempts, no sequence information has been obtained yet on a fourth new subunit (mass 10,566 ± 2 Da) also detected in the HPLC analysis of subcomplex Iß. It is unlikely that any more subunits of the bovine complex remain undiscovered. Therefore, the intact enzyme is a complex of 46 subunits, and, assuming there is one copy of each subunit in the complex, its mass is 980 kDa.
, represents the extrinsic globular domain of the intact complex (12, 13). Subcomplex I
contains both subcomplex I
and part of the membrane arm, and subcomplex Iß is another independent portion of the membrane arm (14, 15). A long term objective is to determine the atomic structure of bovine complex I, and the definition of the subunit compositions of the intact complex and its subcomplexes is an essential step in this process. In the early 1990s, 35 nuclear encoded subunits were characterized. Since then the purity of the complex has improved, and more sensitive methods for protein analysis have been developed. Therefore, as described below, the subunit compositions of the complex and its subcomplexes have been reanalyzed comprehensively by a combination of fractionation of subunits on 1D1 and 2D gels and by HPLC coupled with modern methods of protein analysis by mass spectrometry. The presence in the complex of the 35 previously described subunits has been confirmed, and four hitherto unknown subunits have been detected. The sequences of three of them are described elsewhere (12, 14), and the fourth subunit has not been sequenced yet. It is unlikely that any more subunits of the complex remain to be discovered. The total number of different subunits in the bovine heart complex is 46.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subcomplexes I
and Iß were prepared from complex I by chromatography on Q-Sepharose in 0.1% N,N-lauryldimethylamine oxide with a salt gradient (14). Subcomplexes I
and Iß eluted at 260 and 325 mM NaCl, respectively. The breakthrough fractions contained material referred to previously as subcomplex I
(see "Results"). The 42-kDa subunit, contaminated with lower levels of other subunits, eluted at 125 mM NaCl. The purification of subcomplex I
has been described elsewhere (12).
Fractionation of Protein Complexes in 1D and 2D Gels
The subunits of protein complexes were fractionated by SDS-PAGE in 1222% gels (12) and on 2D gels (isoelectric focusing followed by SDS-PAGE). For the latter purpose, samples of complex I and its subcomplexes were prepared either by dialysis against a buffer, pH 7.4, containing 20 mM Tris-HCl and 0.05% n-dodecyl-ß-D-maltoside followed by concentration to 1020 mg/ml using Ultrafree-0.5 filter units (Millipore, Bedford, MA) or by precipitation with chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) (14). Both methods removed salts from samples, and the chloroform/methanol extraction also removed detergents and lipids. These samples (3060 µg) were denatured by addition of a solution containing 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 12% ASB-14 (Calbiochem), dithiothreitol (2.8 mg ml-1), 0.5% IPG buffer (Amersham Biosciences), and a trace of bromphenol blue. Then they were diluted with a similar solution (but without ASB-14) to a final concentration of ASB-14 of 0.15%. Strips of IPG (7 cm, pH 310 or 611) were rehydrated in these solutions for 12 h at 20 °C with a potential of 20 V. The 2D separations by isoelectric focusing and then SDS-PAGE in a 13% polyacrylamide gel in Tricine buffer (18) were carried out as described previously (14).
Chromatographic Purification of Subunits by Reverse Phase HPLC
Subunits of subcomplexes I
, Iß, and I
were fractionated by reverse phase HPLC on a column of Aquapore RP-300 (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid with a gradient of acetonitrile (12). Each peak was collected separately.
Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Subunits
Every band or spot on 1D or 2D gels was analyzed by peptide mass fingerprinting of tryptic peptides. In every subunit, at least one tryptic peptide was sequenced by tandem MS (see the Supplemental Data Section for more information). The molecular masses of proteins separated by HPLC were measured by ESI-MS (12, 19). Proteins were detected on 1D gels by staining with 0.2% Coomassie R250 in 50% methanol containing 7% acetic acid and on 2D gels with 0.1% colloidal Coomassie G-250 in 3% phosphoric acid and 6% ammonium sulfate. The stained proteins were excised and digested in the gel (20) at 37 °C with either trypsin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0 containing 5 mM CaCl2 or Asp-N protease (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0. Proteins were also digested at room temperature with cyanogen bromide in 70% trifluoroacetic acid (21). Cysteine residues were not reduced and alkylated before cleavage. The digests of all subunits were examined in a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (TofSpec 2E spectrometer, Micromass, Altrincham, UK) and in many cases also by tandem MS peptide sequencing in a Q-TOF instrument (Micromass) as described previously (12).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(12). The positions of subunits are shown in Fig. 1. With care, these gel patterns are reproducible, but they are influenced by minor alterations in the composition of the gel. Therefore, they cannot be used as a reliable basis for the precise interpretation of patterns of subunits of bovine complex I separated in other gel systems.
|
By comparison of Fig. 1, B and C, it is clear that subcomplex I
is a fragment of subcomplex I
. It is also evident that subcomplexes I
and Iß represent different and largely non-overlapping subsets of subunits of complex I that together account for most, but not all, of its subunits (Fig. 1, B and D). Other subunits including ND1, ND2, and B14.5b are abundant components of the breakthrough fraction (Fig. 2A). The weakly associated 42-kDa subunit was recovered from the fractionation separately in an almost homogeneous state (Fig. 2B).
|
|
Subunits Identified by Reverse Phase HPLC Fractionation and Mass Spectrometry
The subunits of subcomplexes I
, Iß, and I
, but not of complex I, were resolved by reverse-phase HPLC (see Fig. 4), and the subunits in each peak were identified by ESI-MS (see below) or by SDS-PAGE. The new subunit, ESSS, was discovered in the analysis of subcomplex Iß (14). In the chromatographic separation of subunits of subcomplexes, the hydrophobic subunits ND1ND6, ND4L, and B14.7 were not recovered from the column, and therefore their masses were not measured by ESI-MS (see below). In numerous independent analyses of subcomplex Iß, a protein with a mass of 10,566 (±2) Da has been observed to coelute with subunit SGDH (see Fig. 4C). In subsequent experiments with a modified gradient, the two subunits were resolved partially. The mixture of the two subunits was digested in separate digests with trypsin, endoproteinase Asp-N, and CNBr and with trypsin and CNBr sequentially in a double digest. Only peptides from subunit SGDH were observed. On N-terminal analysis of the mixture, only the sequence of SGDH was observed, but the mass of the unknown subunit is not compatible with it being an N-terminal fragment of SGDH, and therefore its N terminus is modified. The blocking group was not removed by treatment with methanolic HCl. Therefore, the blocking group is not formyl. The absence of an N-formyl group and the molecular mass of the unknown subunit show that the unknown protein is neither an intact ND subunit (mitochondrial DNA gene product) nor a fragment of any of them. For a number of reasons, it cannot be a fragment of other nuclear encoded blocked subunits (B-subunits) of complex I. For example, all of the B-subunits yielded peptides in various digests, and the mass of the unknown subunit is not compatible with it being a fragment of any of them. Therefore, this recalcitrant 46th subunit requires further exploration.
|
|
-amino group of residue 2 is free and unmodified; in subunit MNLL (N-terminal sequence MMNL) methionine 1 is partly removed (Table I); in another 12 subunits, it is removed, and the
-amino group of residue 2 is either acetylated (11 subunits, including subunit B12 where partial acetylation is found) or myristoylated (subunit B18).
The Acyl Carrier Protein, Subunit SDAP
The sequence of subunit SDAP identified it as an acyl carrier protein. The mature protein mass calculated from the cDNA sequence is 10,109.6 Da, and its mass was measured by ESI-MS to be 10,751.6 Da (25). With subunit isolated from recent preparations of bovine complex I, a mass of 10,674.2 Da has been determined. The difference between the two measured values (77.4 Da) corresponds to the formation in earlier enzyme preparations of a mixed disulfide between the subunit (probably via cysteine 72) and ß-mercaptoethanol (calculated value 76.1 Da), a component of buffers used formerly in the isolation of bovine complex I. In recent preparations, the ß-mercaptoethanol has been replaced by dithiothreitol, and thereby formation of mixed disulfide has been avoided. In the earlier experiments, incubation of the protein under alkaline and reducing conditions decreased the mass from 10,751.6 to 10,449.4 Da, consistent with the hydrolysis of a thioester linkage and loss of an acyl group with a mass of 302.2 Da (25). The mass of the deacyl protein (10,449.4 Da) corresponds to modification of the subunit with the pantetheine-4'-phosphate moiety (10,449.8 Da) as anticipated for an acyl carrier protein. In view of the recent measurements, it is now clear that the loss of 302.2 Da corresponded to the removal of both a ß-mercaptoethyl and an acyl group. Thus, the revised mass of the acyl group is 224.4 Da, leading to a free acid with a mass of 241.4 Da. This value is close to the calculated mass of 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid (244.4 Da), the proposed identity of the acyl group on the acyl carrier protein found in complex I from Neurospora crassa (26, 27). Biotination of the pantetheine-4'-phosphate group would also produce a mass consistent with the observed value of 10,676.1 Da.
Polymorphisms
For both the 51-kDa and the 42-kDa subunits, two sequences have been determined, each differing in a single amino acid. In the 51-kDa subunit, residue 393 has been determined as cysteine (28) and tryptophan (29). Both ESI-MS and tandem MS experiments (see Supplemental Data Fig. S2-2) show that residue 393 is a tryptophan, but the Cambridge cDNA sequence, where the existing data have been reexamined and the existing clone has been reisolated from the same library and resequenced, shows cysteine at this position. By sequencing the cDNA of the 42-kDa subunit, residue 255 has been found to be asparagine (30) and alternatively lysine.2 The ESI-MS experiments support lysine, but the cDNA sequences provide clear evidence for both amino acids. In both cases, the available evidence is consistent with the presence of polymorphisms in the bovine population.
Residual Problems
At the end of this extensive recharacterization of the subunit composition of bovine complex I, a number of apparent anomalies and discrepancies remain between calculated and determined masses of nuclear encoded subunits. They require further experimental exploration.
The measured mass of subunit B12 exceeds the calculated mass of the mature protein sequence by 28 Da. Apart from residues 112, peptide mass mapping of fragments produced by endoproteinase Lys-C, trypsin, and CNBr cleavage have excluded the presence of post-translational modifications in the protein. Histidine residues are found at residues 2, 4, 6, and 8, and the methylation of two of these residues would account for the mass difference, but at present there are no mass measurements on peptides containing residues 112.
The observed and calculated mass values for the 49-kDa, 39-kDa, and PSST subunits do not agree (see Table I). Tryptic peptide mass fingerprinting, tandem MS sequencing, and database searches, including expressed sequence tags, have not produced any evidence for either polymorphisms or post-translational modifications. Therefore, these discrepancies remain unexplained at present.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nonetheless the task of deciding what is an authentic subunit of such a complicated mammalian enzyme remains a difficult task because methods of authentication that can be used with simpler complexes are not readily applicable for practical reasons. For example, reconstitution of the enzyme from individual subunits in vitro would be a formidable task for such a complex membrane-associated enzyme, and mutagenesis of individual subunits, which has been applied successfully to complex I in eubacteria and lower eukaryotes, is much more difficult to apply to the bovine enzyme. In addition to the complexity of subunits that constitute the mammalian assembly, various other properties have hampered the determination of its subunit composition. They include the hydrophobicity of many subunits and the significant number of subunits with modified N termini, which hinder or prevent sequence analysis by Edman degradation.
These difficulties notwithstanding, various criteria have been helpful in deciding whether a protein is an authentic subunit of the complex. They include the presence of the subunit in the intact complex and in its subcomplexes and also in many independently isolated samples of both, the absence of potential complex I subunits from other well characterized protein complexes from the inner membranes of bovine mitochondria, and the presence of homologous subunits in complex I isolated from a range of species. Examples of the utility of the last criterion are the conservation of the "core" subunits of bovine complex I as the minimal complex I in eubacteria (1) and the presence of these and other nuclear encoded subunits in complex I in fungal mitochondria. However, the analyses of the complexes from N. crassa (35, 36) and Yarrowia lipolytica (37) are incomplete, but the current data in N. crassa confirm the presence of homologues of a range of bovine subunits. They suggest also that there may be subunits that are confined to fungi and others that are found only in mammalian enzymes.3
The Subunit Composition of Bovine Complex I
From the analyses described above and in Figs. 14, it appears that bovine complex I is an assembly of 46 different proteins, including the seven proteins that are encoded in mitochondrial DNA and the unsequenced (nuclear encoded) protein with a mass of 10,566 Da. The 38 identified nuclear encoded subunits are listed in Table I. The 42-kDa subunit is loosely bound to the complex. A total of 36 subunits have been detected in at least one of the three subcomplexes (see Table II), the exceptions being the KFYI and MLRQ subunits. It should be noted that subunit MLRQ has been found in a minority of the preparations that have now been analyzed, although it has not been found as a component of any other mitochondrial membrane complex nor has any independent activity been attributed to it. It may be significant that when MLRQ was present, subunit VIB of the cytochrome-c oxidase complex was also detected as a contaminant, and both proteins have been found to coelute with the cytochrome bc1 complex during the purification of complex I. Subunit VIB of the cytochrome-c oxidase complex is involved in the dimerization of bovine cytochrome-c oxidase (39), but when cardiolipin is removed from the preparations, the subunit is lost (40). It is possible that the presence of subunit MLRQ in complex I also depends upon cardiolipin. Therefore, although there is somewhat contradictory evidence about whether MLRQ is a bona fide subunit of the complex, it is listed as such in Table I.
|
, Iß, and I
and how the subunits were identified are summarized in Table II. Most of them were identified by the three independent methods of analysis. Subunits SDAP and B15 were detected in both subcomplexes I
and Iß. Possibly, in the intact complex I, they lie at the boundary between the two subcomplexes, and when the complex is split, they can partition into either of them.
Subcomplex I
contains 15 subunits at apparent stoichiometric levels (12). They include all seven of the nuclear encoded core subunits, which are conserved across a wide range of species and contain all of the bound redox cofactors of the complex. The subcomplex is predominantly hydrophilic, and it constitutes the globular arm of the complex, which protrudes into the matrix. However, in the absence of detergent it tends to aggregate, probably because subunit B16.6 has one predicted transmembrane helix (12). The presence of low levels of subunit B14.7, which also has predicted transmembrane helices (14), may also contribute to this process. Two related subcomplexes, I
S and IS, prepared by varying the composition of the chaotropic detergent, have also been reported, but their subunit compositions have not been characterized fully (13).
The 15 subunits of subcomplex I
are a subset of the 23 present in approximately stoichiometric amounts in subcomplex I
(Table II), which is consistent with the recovery of the subcomplex I
from subcomplex I
treated appropriately with N,N-lauryldimethylamine oxide (17). The additional eight subunits are predicted to contain nine to 10 transmembrane helices, five of them in ND6, which supports the view that subcomplex I
consists of the extrinsic arm and part of the membrane arm of complex I.
Subcomplex Iß contains 12 subunits in apparently stoichiometric amounts (Table II), and these subunits are predicted to contain a total of
36 transmembrane helices (30 of them in subunits ND4 and ND5). Therefore, subcomplex Iß is the most hydrophobic of the three subcomplexes, and it constitutes a major part of the membrane arm of intact complex I.
The compositions of the subcomplexes reported here are similar, but not identical, to compositions reported previously. For example, in one analysis of subcomplex I
, the additional subunits MLRQ and ND2 (<10%) were reported to be present, but subunits B17.2, B16.6, B14.7, B14.5a, B15, and ND6 were not detected (15). In another independent preparation of subcomplex I
, additional subunits B15 and B14 were found, but subunits B17.2, B16.6, and B14.7 were not detected (17). These differences may also reflect minor variations either in splitting the complex or in purification of subcomplexes or both. The most important point is that the preparation procedure now used yields a subcomplex I
of consistent subunit composition.
In the purification of subcomplexes I
and Iß, several subunits were found in the breakthrough fractions, and almost pure 42-kDa subunit was recovered in fractions before subcomplex I
. Similar breakthrough fractions have been referred to as subcomplex I
(17). However, this fragment splits readily into two smaller fragments, and so it is not clear that subcomplex I
represents a true fragment of complex I. The reported protein composition of subcomplex I
is similar to that of the breakthrough fractions plus the 42-kDa subunit, although in the present work, several additional subunits (PGIV, B15, B14.5b, B14.7, B9, and MWFE) were detected. These differences may reflect variation in the initial fragmentation and separation procedures. However, most of these subunits are found also in one or more of subcomplexes I
, I
, and Iß (see Table II). Only subunits KFYI, ND1, ND2, ND3, and ND4L are found uniquely in the fractions known as subcomplex I
(17). Both subunits ND1 and ND4L are in the breakthrough fractions and also in the fraction containing the 42-kDa subunit. It may be that rather than being an integral subcomplex these subunits represent a mixture of several small fragments that "splinter" away during the preparation of subcomplexes I
and Iß.
Concluding Remarks
Complex I from bovine heart mitochondria is one of the most complicated enzymes known. It is a membrane-bound assembly made of 46 different subunits that contains an FMN and up to eight Fe-S clusters.3 Assuming that the complex contains one copy of each of the 46 subunits, its molecular mass is 980 kDa.
It is important to establish its subunit composition for two reasons. First, knowledge of the subunit composition is an essential component of the process of determining the structure of complex I and of understanding its enzymic mechanism. Inevitably the analysis of the subunit composition has raised new issues that require biochemical explanation. Foremost among them are the roles of the numerous supernumerary subunits, especially those such as the acyl carrier protein, with biochemical properties predicted from their sequences that are not apparently related to the electron transfer and associated proton pumping activities of complex I (1). Second, it provides a basis for the characterization of the human enzyme. Human complex I has an increasing medical importance as the catalogue of pathologies grows. The list is dominated by neuromuscular diseases that are associated with mutations in both mitochondrially and nuclear encoded subunits. Other diseases may be related to mutations in undefined factors that influence the assembly of the complex (41). The human enzyme is much less readily available in the quantities required for an exhaustive chemical analysis of its subunits. So far it has been isolated only in small quantities by native gel electrophoresis. Before the advent of the human genome, the cDNAs for many nuclear encoded subunits of bovine complex I were used to clone human homologues (4244). These experiments demonstrated a very high degree of sequence conservation between the two species, and other proteins identified later in the human genome sequence as subunits of complex I by homology with bovine sequences support this conclusion. Antibodies raised against some recombinant bovine subunits have been used to confirm directly the presence of homologues in the human enzyme (45, 46), but for most nuclear encoded subunits direct confirmation of the presence of homologues of bovine subunits in the human complex is lacking. Another aspect of mammalian complex I that remains unexplored is whether other tissues contain isoforms of some of the supernumerary heart subunits similar to the tissue-specific isoform subunits of cytochrome-c oxidase (4749). Thus, the exact definition of human complex I in all tissues will require more experimentation with both bovine and human material.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published, MCP Papers in Press, February 22, 2003, DOI 10.1074/mcp.M300014-MCP200
1 The abbreviations used are: 1D, one-dimensional; 2D, two-dimensional; ASB-14, amidosulfobetaine-14; IPG, immobilized pH gradient; ESI, electrospray ionization; MS, mass spectrometry; MALDI, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization; TOF, time of flight; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid. ![]()
2 M. S. Sharpley and J. Hirst, unpublished data. ![]()
3 J. Hirst, J. Carroll, I. M. Fearnley, R. J. Shannon, and J. E. Walker, submitted. ![]()
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. ![]()
S The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.mcponline.org) contains a supplemental section. Part 1 summarizes the MS data used to identify components of subcomplexes I
and Iß and the protein compositions of other fractions reported in Figs. 1, B and D, and 2, A and B (Tables S1-1 to S1-4 and Figs. S1-1 to S1-54). Part 2 contains tantem MS data supporting some of the sequence observations reported in this paper (Figs. S2-1 and S2-2). Part 3 contains electrospray ionization MS data supporting the new mass data reported in Table I (Figs. S3-1 to S3-7). ![]()
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Medical Research Council Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, The Wellcome Trust/MRC Bldg., Hills Rd., Cambridge CB2 2XY, UK. Tel.: 44-1223-252701; Fax: 44-1223-252705; E-mail: walker{at}mrc-dunn.cam.ac.uk
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Shimizu, L. Peng, F. Myouga, R. Motohashi, K. Shinozaki, and T. Shikanai CRR23/NdhL is a Subunit of the Chloroplast NAD(P)H Dehydrogenase Complex in Arabidopsis Plant Cell Physiol., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 835 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lu and X. Cao GRIM-19 Is Essential for Maintenance of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2008; 19(5): 1893 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ricci, V. Pastukh, J. Leonard, J. Turrens, G. Wilson, D. Schaffer, and S. W. Schaffer Mitochondrial DNA damage triggers mitochondrial-superoxide generation and apoptosis Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): C413 - C422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lazarou, M. McKenzie, A. Ohtake, D. R. Thorburn, and M. T. Ryan Analysis of the Assembly Profiles for Mitochondrial- and Nuclear-DNA-Encoded Subunits into Complex I Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2007; 27(12): 4228 - 4237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. O. Vogel, C. E. J. Dieteren, L. P. W. J. van den Heuvel, P. H. G. M. Willems, J. A. M. Smeitink, W. J. H. Koopman, and L. G. J. Nijtmans Identification of Mitochondrial Complex I Assembly Intermediates by Tracing Tagged NDUFS3 Demonstrates the Entry Point of Mitochondrial Subunits J. Biol. Chem., March 9, 2007; 282(10): 7582 - 7590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Stephens, S. H. Lee, K. S. Paul, and P. T. Englund Mitochondrial Fatty Acid Synthesis in Trypanosoma brucei J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 4427 - 4436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |