|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 6:451-459, 2007.
© 2007 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
,
,¶
,¶,||

,**
,
,

From
Aptanomics S.A., 181-203, avenue Jean Jaurès, 69007 Lyon, France, and
Differentiation and Cell Cycle Group, Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire de la Cellule, UMR 5161 CNRS/Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) U1237/Ecole Normale Supérieure Lyon and ** INSERM U758, IFR128 "Biosciences Lyon-Gerland," Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46, allée dItalie, 69364 Lyon cedex 07, France
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A straightforward selection of transdominant negative agents that inhibit cell proliferation is an oxymoron. Elaborate experimental schemes have thus been developed and used successfully to identify cytostatic random cDNA fragments (12) and random linear peptides terminally fused to GFP1 (13). In both cases, a counterselection against dividing cells has been devised and, in the latter case, coupled to a positive screening for cells that do not divide and thus maintain a fluorescent vital dye. Although different antiproliferative linear peptides have been isolated, their mechanism of action has not been elucidated so far (13).
We set out to isolate another kind of combinatorial protein reagents for their ability to inhibit tumor cell proliferation with the hope of identifying proteins playing an unexpected role in this biological phenomenon. Peptide aptamers are man-made combinatorial protein reagents that bind target proteins and can interfere with their function in living cells and organisms (Ref. 14; for a review, see Ref. ). They consist of conformationally constrained random sequence peptide loops displayed by a scaffold protein. They bind their cognate targets with a strong affinity and, usually, a high specificity, which allows them to discriminate between closely related members within a protein family (14) or even between different allelic variants of a given protein (15). So far, peptide aptamers have been mostly selected through yeast two-hybrid screening experiments for their ability to bind a given target protein. In fewer instances, peptide aptamers have been selected for their ability to confer selectable phenotypes to yeast (16, 17) and bacteria (18). Peptide aptamers selected in yeast have been used successfully to identify their cognate target proteins by two-hybrid screening.
Here we have constructed a peptide aptamer library in a simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-derived gene expression system. We have performed an iterative genetic screening to isolate peptide aptamers that inhibit tumor cell proliferation. We have identified the catalytic subunit of the calcium-activated protein phosphatase calcineurin as a target of one of the isolated aptamers. We have shown that this aptamer up-regulates the phosphatase activity of calcineurin in vitro and in cultured cells. Our work has identified an antiproliferative molecule that binds and stimulates calcineurin through a seemingly original mechanism.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Construction of Lentiviral Vectors
All the lentivectors were derived from pR4SA-EFS-GFP-W (19). We first digested this vector with HindIII, thus eliminating EGFP, woodchuck hepatitis post-transcriptional regulatory element, and EcoRI sites, to create pVRV1. We blunted the remaining EcoRI site upstream of the cytomegalovirus promoter and religated the vector to create pVRV2. We digested pVRV2 with BamHI and HindIII, and we ligated the hybridized oligodeoxynucleotides 5'-GATCGCTAAGCGAATTCCTCGAGGCGCGCGTCGACCAGGATCC-3' and 5'-AGCTTGGATCCTGGTCGACGCGCGCCTCGAGGAATTCGCTTAGC-3' to create pVRV3, which bears a multiple cloning sequence. We constructed pVRV4 by inserting an IRES-EGFPf (farnesylated enhanced GFP) coding sequence in pVRV3. This was done by a multiplex ligation between SalI/BamHI-cut pVRV3, a SalI/NcoI-cut encephalomyocarditis virus IRES cassette (from pIRES2-EGFP, Clontech), and an NcoI/BamHI-cut EGFPf coding sequence (from pEGFP-F, Takara Bio). We then PCR-amplified an HA-tagged human thioredoxin (HTRX) fragment from pJMX-HTRX2 using the oligonucleotides 5'-GCGGCTAAGCCATGTACCCTTATGATGTGCCAG-3' and 5'-GGAGACTTGACCAAACCTCTG-3', and we ligated this fragment into BlpI/XhoI-cut pVRV4. The resulting plasmid, pVRV6, directs the bicistronic expression of an HA-tagged human thioredoxin (with a modified active site) and of EGFP carrying a farnesylation sequence to anchor the marker protein to plasma membranes.
Construction of the Peptide Aptamer Expression Library
We constructed pBK1, a library of peptide aptamers bearing 10 amino acids within the active site of HA-tagged human thioredoxin. We annealed the oligonucleotides 5'-TGGGCCGAGTGGAGCGGTCCG(NNS)9NNCGGACCGAGCAAGATGATCGCCCC-3' (N, A or C or G or T; S, C or G) and 5'-GGGGCGATCATCTTGCTCGGTCCG-3', and we produced duplexes using the Klenow DNA polymerase. We ligated the AvaII-cut duplexes into CpoI-cut pVRV6. We transformed the ligation product into ElectroTen Blue competent bacteria (Stratagene), and we obtained 8.5 x 109 transformants.
Viral Vector Production
We produced lentiviral particles by transfecting into 293T cells the following plasmids: (i) pVRV6, pVRV12 (pVRV6 directing the expression of p21Cip1), pBK1, or any aptamer sublibrary; (ii) helper pSIV15, directing the expression of gag and pol (20); (iii) FbmoSalf, directing the expression of a murine ecotropic envelope (19); and (iv) pRev (20). In some experiments, plasmids iii and iv were replaced by the G-rev plasmid (20), directing the expression of Rev and the vesicular stomatitis virus-G pantropic envelope. We collected and filtered lentivirus-containing supernatants 48 h post-transfection through a 0.45-µm filter. We determined viral titers by infecting XC or HeLa cells and counting GFP-positive cells with a cytometer (FACScan, BD Biosciences). We routinely infected from 40 to 100% cells.
Screening of Antiproliferative Peptide Aptamers
We plated XC cells 24 h before infection (2 x 105 cells/well, 6-well plates, six plates). To infect the cells, we added a medium containing a viral supernatant and 6 µg/ml Polybrene. Three days later, we collected the cells, washed them with PBS, stained 5 x 105 cells/ml with 10 µM CellTrackerTM Orange CMTMR (5-(and-6)-(((4-chloromethyl)benzoyl) amino)tetramethylrhodamine; Invitrogen) in PBS at 37 °C for 30 min, and incubated the cells in culture medium for another 30 min at 37 °C. We then plated the cells onto 10-cm dishes (106 cells/dish). After 72 h, we collected the cells, and we sorted the highest percentile of CMTMR fluorescent cells using a FACS Vantage flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). We pooled the sorted cells, and we extracted their genomic DNA using a Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega). We PCR-amplified aptamer coding genes using the oligonucleotides 5'-AACCGGTGCCTAGAGAAGGT-3' and 5'-AGACCCCTAGGAATGCTCGT-3'. We cloned the EcoRI/XhoI-digested products into EcoRI/XhoI-cut pVRV6 to create successive sublibraries of peptide aptamers named pCMTMR 1 to 7.
Two-hybrid Screening of R5G42-interacting Proteins
We digested pVRV6-R5G42 with EcoRI and XhoI and ligated the fragment into EcoRI/XhoI-cut pGILDA (Clontech) to create pGILDA-R5G42, a plasmid directing the galactose-inducible expression of a LexA-R5G42 fusion protein. We transformed MB226
pSH18-34 yeast (21) with pGILDA-R5G42 and MB210a yeast (21) with human fetal brain and human testes cDNA libraries constructed in pJG4-5. We performed the yeast-two hybrid screening of both libraries essentially as described previously (21) using 4 x 108 and 2.4 x 108 colony-forming units from the brain and testes libraries, respectively. We estimated the mating efficiency at 50 and 58% and the number of diploid exconjugants at 0.2 x 108 and 1 x 108 for the brain and testis cDNA library-transformed yeast, respectively. We induced the expression of the bait and the libraries at 30 °C for 5 h from 10% of the diploids. We collected the yeast and plated them onto 10 UraHisTrpLeu galactose/raffinose plates for 5 days. We replica-plated onto 10 UraHisTrpAde 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) galactose/raffinose plates. We picked 60 clones from the brain and 48 clones from the testes library that grew in the absence of leucine and adenine and that displayed a ß-galactosidase activity. Library plasmids were recovered and retransformed into EGY48
. The interaction phenotypes were confirmed by a mating assay with EGY42a transformed with pGILDA-R5G42. We then sequenced the library cDNAs from most reconfirmed clones.
Yeast Two-hybrid Mating Assays
To build the different truncations of the CNAßCter-interacting clone, we designed the following oligonucleotides that enabled cloning the PCR products into pJG4-5 by homologous recombination: RH6, 5'-TTATGATGTGCCAGATTATGCCTCTCCCGAATTCagtatttgctctgatgatg-3'; RH4, 5'-AAACCTCTGGCGAAGAAGTCCAAAGCTTCTCGAGCTActgtacagcatctttccg-3'; RH3, 5'-AAACCTCTGGCGAAGAAGTCCAAAGCTTCTCGAGCTAggcactttgcagggtctgc-3'; RH7, 5'-ACCTCTGGCGAAGAAGTCCAAAGCTTCTCGAGTCAcctgagaacagagaagact-3'.
The 5'-end of RH6 (uppercase) matches part of the HA epitope tag, and the 5'-ends of RH4, RH3, and RH7 (uppercase) match the 5'-extremity of the alcohol dehydrogenase terminator. We performed the PCRs using pCMV-SPORT6-CnAß (see below) as a template. We constructed CNAßCter
1,
2, and CaM by combining oligonucleotides RH6/RH4, RH6/RH3, and RH6/RH7, respectively. We co-transformed MB210a with the PCR products and EcoRI/XhoI-cut pJG4-5. We retrieved the prey plasmids from the transformants (21), and we checked the homologous recombination products by sequencing. We also transformed MB210a with positive and negative controls of interaction. We co-transformed TB50
with pSH18-34T (a plasmid bearing a high sensitivity lacZ reporter gene) and pGILDA directing the expression of LexA, LexA-R5G42, LexA-R7G44, and LexA-R5G52. We performed the yeast two-hybrid mating assays as described previously (21).
In Vitro Binding Assay
We first digested pVRV6-aptamer plasmids with EcoRI and XhoI and ligated the fragments into EcoRI/XhoI-cut pGEX4T1. We expressed GST-aptamer fusions in a BL-21(DE3) Escherichia coli strain. We diluted 1:100 overnight cultures and let them grow at 37 °C to reach an A600 of 0.60.8. We induced the expression of fusion proteins by adding 1 mM isopropyl 1-thio-ß-D-galactopyranoside and incubating overnight at 20 °C with vigorous shaking. We collected the bacteria and resuspended them into a lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT) containing 1 mg/ml lysozyme. We froze and thawed the cells three times and sonicated them on ice. We centrifuged the lysates at 13,000 x g for 30 min, and we collected the soluble fractions. We immobilized equal amounts of GST-aptamer fusion proteins on 100 µl of glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Biosciences) at room temperature for 20 min. We washed the beads three times with lysis buffer. We incubated the beads with 1 or 3 µg of bovine brain purified calcineurin (Upstate) for 1 h at 4 °C. We then washed the beads five times with lysis buffer, and we eluted the bound protein by boiling samples for 10 min in the presence of electrophoresis loading buffer. We resolved the samples by SDS-PAGE, transferred the proteins to nitrocellulose membrane, and detected calcineurin by Western blotting using an anti-calcineurin pan A antibody (1:1000, Chemicon International). We revealed the blot using a horseradish peroxidase-linked rabbit antiserum and an ECL kit (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Cell Proliferation Assay
To stably express peptide aptamers in mammalian cells, we used the episomal eukaryotic expression vector pCEP4 that bears a cytomegalovirus promoter and a hygromycin selection marker (Invitrogen). We PCR-amplified aptamer coding sequences using the oligonucleotides 5'-GCAAGCTAGCATGTACCCTTATGATGTGCCA-3' that hybridized to the HA coding sequence and 5'-CGTTGCGGCCGCTTAGACTAATTCATTAATGGT-3' that contained a stop codon. We digested the PCR products with NheI and NotI and ligated them into NheI/NotI-cut pCEP4 to create pEA-aptamer plasmids. We plated 3 x 105 cells/well in 6-well plates and transfected the cells 24 h later using jetPEI (Qbiogen), 3.7 µg of pEA-aptamer plasmids, and 0.3 µg of pEGFP-C1 (Clontech) to monitor transfection. We added hygromycin (Invitrogen) at 200 µg/ml 2 days later, and we cultured the cells for 2 weeks, renewing the medium twice a week. We then rinsed the cells in PBS, and we fixed and stained them by incubating for 30 min in crystal violet (0.05% crystal violet, 20% ethanol, 0.37% formaldehyde). We removed excess crystal violet by washing with water.
In Vitro Phosphatase Assay
We first produced GST-aptamer fusion proteins as described above. For this experiment, we eluted GST-aptamer fusion proteins from glutathione-Sepharose beads using 20 mM reduced L-glutathione (Sigma), and we dialyzed the eluates overnight against a phosphatase buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.1 mM CaCl2). We measured the phosphatase activity of calcineurin using para-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) (Sigma) as substrate in a final volume of 100 µl. The sample solution contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM NiSO4, 0.15 mg/ml BSA (Sigma), 0.1 µM calcineurin (Upstate). We added purified calmodulin (Upstate) and GST-aptamer fusion proteins at different concentrations (see figure legends). After a 15-min preincubation at 37 °C, we started the reactions by adding 4.1 mM pNPP, and we incubated the mixtures at 37 °C for 20 min. We measured the nitrophenylate product at 405 nm using an Envision plate reader (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). We subtracted the background level that we determined using a reaction mixture lacking calcineurin.
Monitoring of BAD Phosphorylation
We cloned the peptide aptamer coding genes into pPEAt (a pCEP4-based vector that bears a tetracycline-inducible promoter and a hygromycin resistance gene) as described above (see "Cell Proliferation Assay").
We seeded 4 x 105 HeLa-Tet cells/well in a 6-well plate 24 h before transfection. We transfected with jetPEI (Qbiogen), 1 µg of pEBG-mBad (a plasmid directing the expression of the murine BAD protein; Cell Signaling Technology), 0.5 µg of pCMV-SPORT6-CnAß and pCMV-SPORT6-CnB (plasmids directing the expression of human calcineurin Aß and B; RZPD), and 1 µg of pPEAt-R5G42, -R5G52, or -R7G44. After an overnight incubation of the transfection mixture, we washed the cells once with culture medium, and we added fresh medium with or without 0.5 µM FK506 (Calbiochem). We collected the cells 24 h later, washed them twice in PBS, and lysed them for 20 min in ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, protease inhibitor mixture Complete EDTA-free (Roche Applied Science)). We centrifuged the lysates to remove cellular debris, and we quantified the protein content using the microBCA protein assay kit (Pierce). We resolved 50 µg of the lysates by 412% SDS-PAGE, transferred the proteins to nitrocellulose membranes, and blotted with anti-phospho-BAD (Ser-112), anti-phospho-BAD (Ser-136), and anti-BAD antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology). We revealed the blots using the ECL system (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
promoter (see "Experimental Procedures"). We first built 12 low complexity peptide aptamer libraries, combining two scaffolds (human thioredoxin or an E. coli thioredoxin, whose coding sequence harbors codons optimized for expression in mammalian cells), two epitope tags (HA or His6), and three variable region lengths (16, 10, or 7 amino acids). We performed pilot experiments to determine which library yielded the highest expression level of peptide aptamers upon transduction of XC cells with viral particles. We observed that the best combination was the HA-tagged, human thioredoxin displaying random peptide loops of 10 amino acids (data not shown), and we constructed accordingly pBK1, a high complexity peptide aptamer library (Fig. 1a).
|
Isolation of Antiproliferative Peptide Aptamers
We used rat XC cells, derived from a Rous sarcoma virus-induced sarcoma, enabling us to use viral particles harboring a murine ecotropic envelope. We performed seven screening iterations before isolating and characterizing individual peptide aptamers. We determined the antiproliferative activity of the sublibraries both in XC cells and in human HeLa cells. As shown in Fig. 2a, the mean fluorescence intensity of both cell lines increases gradually with the number of screening iterations, thereby indicating a progressive enrichment of antiproliferative peptide aptamers within the sublibraries.
|
|
Identification of Calcineurin A as a Target Protein
We performed two yeast two-hybrid screening experiments against a LexA-R5G42 bait protein using a human testis and a human fetal brain cDNA library. We obtained 29 and 42 reconfirmed clones, respectively. We disregarded those clones that either showed a barely detectable two-hybrid interaction phenotype, cross-interacted with control aptamers, or corresponded to hypothetical proteins (Table II). We thus retained two candidates. The highest occurring clone, from both libraries, corresponded to the NS5A-TP2 protein recently discovered through a systematic search for genes that are transactivated by the non-structural NS5A protein from hepatitis C virus (22). No biological knowledge is currently available for this protein. The other remaining target candidate was calcineurin A (CNA), for which two different isoforms (ß and
) were selected from the testes library (Fig. 3a). We decided to focus our work on CNA.
|
|
isoforms, encompassing the calmodulin-binding domain and the autoinhibitory domain (Fig. 3b). Among the three truncations constructed from the CNAß selected clone (Fig. 3b), only CNAß
1 retained its yeast two-hybrid interaction phenotype with R5G42 (Fig. 3a and data not shown). These results indicate that the R5G42 binding site on CNA lies between the amino terminus of the calmodulin-binding domain and the carboxyl terminus of the autoinhibitory domain and is not circumscribed to the calmodulin (CaM)-binding domain. This yeast two-hybrid mating assay also supports the specificity of interaction between R5G42 and CNA as R5G42 did not show an interaction phenotype with two unrelated bait proteins (RAS and FKBP12) and as R7G44 and R5G52 did not show an interaction phenotype with CNA. R5G52, however, did not show an interaction phenotype with peptide aptamer RG22, which interacts with LexA in the context of most (but not all) LexA fusion proteins. The LexA-R5G52 bait protein may thus not be properly expressed and/or folded in this yeast two-hybrid setting. To confirm the interaction between R5G42 and CNA, we performed an in vitro binding assay between recombinant purified GST-aptamer fusion proteins, coupled to a glutathione-Sepharose matrix, and purified CNA. The GST-R5G42 solid phase readily captured CNA as opposed to a GST-R7G44 control (Fig. 3c).
Modulation of Calcineurin Activity
We next explored the ability of R5G42 to modulate the enzymatic activity of its target protein. To this end, we first performed an in vitro phosphatase assay using purified CNA and pNPP as a substrate. As shown in Fig. 4a, the addition of purified CaM is required to activate CNA. The addition of recombinant purified GST-R5G42 did not result in an inhibition or an exacerbation of CaM-activated CNA phosphatase activity (not shown). However, the addition of high concentrations of GST-R5G42 activated CNA phosphatase activity in the absence of CaM to a level comparable to that observed using CaM. The addition of equal amounts of the control aptamer R7G44 did not produce a significant effect. This experiment indicates that R5G42, like CaM, binds and activates CNA phosphatase activity in vitro.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here we have shown that an antiproliferative peptide aptamer (R5G42) bound CNA and activated its phosphatase activity in vitro. Consistent with the in vitro results, the transient expression of R5G42 in human cells induced the dephosphorylation of BAD on serine 136, which was totally reversed by FK506. The expression of R5G52, another antiproliferative peptide aptamer, did not affect BAD phosphorylation levels. Altogether these results indicate that BAD dephosphorylation is specifically caused by the activation of CNA by R5G42 as opposed to being an indirect consequence of an antiproliferative activity. The antiproliferative effect of R5G42 could stem from a calcineurin-mediated induction of apoptosis, which would only occur upon prolonged expression of the peptide aptamer. Indeed we have failed to show that transient expression of R5G42 caused conspicuous signs of apoptosis or cell cycle arrest (not shown). Importantly we cannot rule out the possibility that the targeting of NS5A-TP2 (or another unidentified target protein) also contributes to the antiproliferative effect of R5G42. NS5A-TP2 contains a conserved HD domain found in many phosphatases. The use of the R5G42 peptide aptamer may help elucidate the function of this protein, which may play a role in the control of cell proliferation.
The structural mechanisms of the activation and the inhibition of calcineurin by, respectively, calmodulin and immunophilin-immunosuppressant complexes remain poorly understood (26). Here we describe a new CNA ligand that activates CNA phosphatase activity through a potentially original mechanism because its binding site is located between the CaM-binding domain and the autoinhibitory domain but does not appear to be circumscribed to the CaM-binding domain. Structural studies of the CNA-R5G42 complex will be needed to elucidate the activation mechanism, which may help clarify the still elusive physiological activation and inhibition mechanisms of calcineurin.
This study describes the first phenotypic selection of peptide aptamers in mammalian cells. It also describes the first identification of a functional perturbation of a protein targeted by combinatorial protein molecules isolated from an antiproliferative screening. A number of arguments strongly support the choice of peptide aptamers to perform various phenotypic screening or selections with the goal of interrogating proteomes to identify target proteins involved in the underlying regulatory networks. First, proof of concept has been obtained in yeast where peptide aptamers were selected for their ability to overcome the cell cycle arrest induced by a mating pheromone and where target proteins were identified by yeast two-hybrid screening (16, 17). Second, peptide aptamers can target many different kinds of intracellular proteins such as kinases, phosphatases, receptors, adaptor proteins, transcription factors, chaperones, etc. involved in many regulatory pathways (for a review, see Ref. 4). Third, peptide aptamers have been shown to decorate their target proteins by binding to many different surfaces involved in different functions (27). For this reason, peptide aptamers can induce a broader range of perturbations on protein function than other reverse genetics methods such as gene knock-out or the use of transdominant negative alleles.2 Last, the double constraint imposed on the variable regions reduces the conformational freedom and yields typically high binding affinities for the target proteins, thereby facilitating their identification by different methods.
Our work illustrates the particularities of using combinatorial protein molecules for phenotypic screening of transdominant reagents. The main limitation lies in the tedious target identification step. When using nucleic acid molecules (cDNA fragments, antisense molecules, or short hairpin RNAs), the identity of the target proteins is immediately unveiled by sequencing the isolated library members. In contrast, selected combinatorial protein molecules must be used as probes to determine the identity of their targets by performing yeast two-hybrid cDNA screening (10, 16, 17) or affinity capture experiments followed by mass spectrometry (28). However, combinatorial protein molecules, and particularly peptide aptamers, present a considerable advantage above nucleic acid molecules. Whereas the latter can only inhibit the function of their target proteins (by a dominant negative effect or by reducing expression levels), the former can cause more diverse perturbations on the function of their targets, including an activation as observed in this study. Therefore, the use of combinatorial protein molecules for phenotypic screening or selections allows a more extensive probing of proteomes, thus enhancing the chances to identify different target proteins whose perturbations cause a given phenotype. Another significant advantage of using peptide aptamers lies in their application for drug discovery. Once their target proteins are identified, peptide aptamers can guide the identification of small molecule mimics that bind the same molecular surfaces on the targets and induce the same biological effects (27). We anticipate that the use of retroviral libraries of peptide aptamers for phenotypic screening or selections will aid the unraveling of molecular regulatory networks that control major biological processes and will impact positively therapeutic research by facilitating the discovery of new targets and small molecule drugs.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published, MCP Papers in Press, December 4, 2006, DOI 10.1074/mcp.M600102-MCP200
1 The abbreviations used are: GFP, green fluorescent protein; CNA, calcineurin A; SIV, simian immunodeficiency virus; EGFP, enhanced GFP; EGFPf, farnesylated enhanced GFP; IRES, internal ribosome entry site; HA, hemagglutinin; HTRX, human thioredoxin; CMTMR, 5-(and-6)-(((4-chloromethyl)benzoyl)amino)tetramethylrhodamine; CaM, calmodulin; pNPP, para-nitrophenyl phosphate. ![]()
2 N. Abed, M. Bickle, B. Mari, M. Schapira, R. Sanjuan-España, D. Moncorgé, S. Mouradian-Garcia, P. Barbry, B. B. Rudkin, M-O. Fauvarque, I. Michaud-Soret, and P. Colas, manuscript in preparation. ![]()
* This work was supported by a GenHomme Bio-Ingénierie 2001 grant from the French Ministry of Research and by an OSEO-ANVAR innovation transfer award. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. ![]()
¶ Both authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
|| Present address: Laboratoire de Génétique, Groupe Polarité Signalisation et Cancer, UMR5201-Génétique Moléculaire Signalisation et Cancer, 8 avenue Rockefeller, 69373 Lyon cedex 08, France. ![]()

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-4-72-72-85-87; Fax: 33-4-72-72-80-80; E-mail: pierre.colas{at}aptanomics.com
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Abed, M. Bickle, B. Mari, M. Schapira, R. Sanjuan-Espana, K. Robbe Sermesant, O. Moncorge, S. Mouradian-Garcia, P. Barbry, B. B. Rudkin, et al. A Comparative Analysis of Perturbations Caused by a Gene Knock-out, a Dominant Negative Allele, and a Set of Peptide Aptamers Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2007; 6(12): 2110 - 2121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |