Advertisement
MCP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/mcp.M600398-MCP200 on January 8, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M600398-MCP200v1
6/4/689    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Glossary
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guo, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, J. G. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guo, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, J. G. N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 6:689-696, 2007.
© 2007 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Research

Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Human Endothelial Cell Membrane Rafts

Evidence of MARCKS and MRP Regulation in the Sphingosine 1-Phosphate-induced Barrier Enhancement*,S

Yurong Guo{ddagger},§, Patrick A. Singleton, Austin Rowshan{ddagger}, Marjan Gucek||, Robert N. Cole||, David R. M. Graham{ddagger}, Jennifer E. Van Eyk{ddagger},||,** and Joe G. N. Garcia

From the {ddagger} Department of Medicine, || Biological Chemistry, ** Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21234 and Department of Medicine, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Endothelial cell barrier dysfunction results in the increased vascular permeability observed in inflammation, tumor metastasis, angiogenesis, and atherosclerosis. Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), a biologically active phosphorylated lipid growth factor released from activated platelets, enhances the endothelial cell barrier integrity in vitro and in vivo. To begin to identify the molecular mechanisms mediating S1P induced endothelial barrier enhancement, quantitative proteomics analysis (iTRAQTM) was performed on membrane rafts isolated from human pulmonary artery endothelial cells in the absence or presence of S1P stimulation. Our results demonstrated that S1P mediates rapid and specific recruitment (1 µM, 5 min) of myristoylated alanine-rich protein kinase C substrate (MARCKS) and MARCKS-related protein (MRP) to membrane rafts. Western blot experiments confirmed these findings with both MARCKS and MRP. Finally, small interfering RNA-mediated silencing of MARCKS or MRP or both attenuates S1P-mediated endothelial cell barrier enhancement. These data suggest the regulation of S1P-mediated endothelial cell barrier enhancement via the cell specific localization of MARCKS and MRP and validate the utility of proteomics approaches in the identification of novel molecular targets.

The pulmonary endothelium serves as a semipermeable cellular barrier between blood and the interstitium and airspaces of the lung. Endothelial cell (EC)1 barrier dysfunction results in increased vascular permeability, which is a cardinal feature of inflammation and an essential component of tumor metastasis, angiogenesis, and atherosclerosis. Proteins and lipids released after platelet activation have long been appreciated as enhancing the integrity of the microcirculation (1, 2). Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), a biologically active phosphorylated lipid growth factor released from platelet, has multiple EC effects, including promoting barrier integrity in vivo and in vitro across both human and bovine pulmonary artery and lung microvascular ECs (3, 4). Our previous studies demonstrated S1P mediated barrier enhancement to be dependent on S1P binding to its major surface receptor, S1P1; activation of the small GTPase, Rac1; and rearrangement of the cortical actin cytoskeleton (3, 5, 6). Very recently, we further detailed the essential involvement of PI 3-kinase, Tiam1, and {alpha}-actinin in specialized membrane domains (i.e. membrane rafts) in S1P-treated EC barrier regulation (7). However, the underlying signaling mechanisms by which S1P increases vascular integrity via signaling to the endothelial cytoskeleton remain poorly understood.

As defined by the recent Keystone Symposium on lipid rafts and cell function (March 23–28, 2006, in Steamboat Springs, CO) (8), "Membrane rafts are small (10–200 nm), heterogeneous, highly dynamic, sterol- and sphingolipid-enriched domains that compartmentalize cellular processes. Small rafts can sometimes be stabilized to form larger platforms through protein-protein and protein-lipid interactions." Many biophysical, biochemical, and microscopy studies suggest that membrane rafts truly exist and are implicated in diverse cellular processes including signal transduction (9–12). Currently, two commonly used methods to isolate membrane rafts, resistant to either high pH or nonionic detergents, involve separation of membrane rafts from other proteins by density gradient centrifugation, with detergent resistance the more widely utilized method.

To begin to identify the underlying signaling mechanisms by which S1P increases vascular integrity, we chose to identify protein changes in membrane rafts isolated from human pulmonary artery ECs in the presence or absence of S1P treatment (1 µM, 5 min) using quantitative proteomics analysis. The time period and concentration for S1P treatment were based on previous studies (3, 4). Because of the extremely hydrophobic nature of membrane rafts, we chose a solution-based proteomics approach, isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQTM) method. The protein changes in membrane rafts were confirmed by Western blot analysis. Linking these proteins to EC barrier enhancement was then explored using siRNA transfection and measurement of transendothelial electrical resistance (TER).


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture—
Human pulmonary artery ECs were obtained from Cambrex Bioscience (East Rutherford, NJ) and cultured as described previously (3) in EGM-2 BulletKits (Cambrex Bioscience) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 95% air.

Isolation of Membrane Rafts from Human Pulmonary Artery EC—
ECs were grown to confluence at passage 7 in T150 flasks (~1.5 x 107 cells each flask), washed with PBS, and serum-starved in EBM-2 media (Cambrex Bioscience) for 1 h. Confluent EC monolayers were either untreated (control) or treated with 1 µM S1P for 5 min, after which the cells were washed three times with cold PBS (4 °C) and stored at –80 °C. Membrane rafts were isolated using the low density detergent-resistant fractionation as described (13). Briefly, 750 µl of cold (~4 °C) TKM (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 25 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA) in 1% Triton X-100 solution containing protease inhibitors was added to each flask while still cold. The cells were then scraped and homogenized using a Dounce homogenizer. The concentration of Triton X-100 in the suspension was adjusted to 1% by the addition of 10% Triton X-100, and the suspension was placed on ice for ~30 min with pipetting every 10 min. Next, 0.5 ml of the lysate was mixed with equal volume of 80% sucrose and overlaid with 6 ml of 38% sucrose and 4 ml of 5% sucrose in an ultracentrifuge tube. The gradients were centrifuged (40,200 rpm, SW60 rotor) for 12 h at 4 °C. Fractions of 1 ml were taken from the top to bottom, and Western blots were performed to verify the localization of membrane rafts marker caveolin-1. Membrane rafts fractions (fraction 4, 5, and 6 from the top) were pooled and precipitated in trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and the pellet was dissolved in 1% SDS, 100 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB), pH 8.5. A BCA assay was performed to measure the protein concentration.

Protein Digest, iTRAQ Labeling, and Strong Cation Exchange Fractionation—
Control and S1P-treated membrane rafts in 1% SDS, 100 mM TEAB were diluted 5-fold with 100 mM TEAB. The samples (50 µg each) were reduced, alkylated, and digested with trypsin with a protein to enzyme ratio of 20:1 at 37 °C overnight. Each digest was concentrated to 15 µl in a speed vac followed by the addition of 15 µl of 1 M TEAB. The iTRAQ reagent was dissolved in 70 µl of ethanol and added to the digest, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Control and S1P-treated membrane rafts labeled with different iTRAQ reagents were mixed and dried down to a volume of 50 µl. The combined peptide mixture was fractionated by strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography on an Ultimate HPLC system (LC Packings) using a polysulfoethyl A column (2.1 x 100 mm, 5 µm, 300 Å, PolyLC, Columbia, MD). The sample was next dissolved in 1 ml of SCX loading buffer (25% v/v acetonitrile, 10 mM KH2PO4, pH 2.8), and pH was adjusted to 2.8 by adding 1 M phosphoric acid. The entire sample was loaded onto the column and washed isocratically for 30 min at 200 µl/min. Peptides were eluted with a linear gradient of 0–500 mM KCl (25% v/v acetonitrile, 10 mM KH2PO4, pH 2.8) over 30 min at a flow rate of 200 µl/min. The absorbance at 214 nm was monitored, and 15 fractions were collected along the gradient.

LC-MS Analysis—
Each SCX fraction was dried down, dissolved in 0.1% formic acid, and analyzed on Qstar PulsarTM (Applied Biosystems-MDS Sciex) interfaced with an Agilent 1100 HPLC system. Peptides were separated on a reverse-phase column packed with 10 cm of C18 beads (360 x 75 µm, 5 µm, 120 Å, YMC ODS-AQ, Waters Associates, Milford, MA) with an emitter tip (New Objective, Woburn, MA) attached. The HPLC gradient was 5–40% B for 60 min (A, 0.1% formic acid; B, 90% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. Survey scans were acquired from m/z 400–1200 with up to three precursors selected for MS/MS using a dynamic exclusion of 45 s. A rolling collision energy was used to promote fragmentation, and the collision energy range was ~20% higher than that used for unlabeled peptides because of iTRAQ tags.

Data Analysis—
The MS/MS spectra were extracted and searched against Uniprot-sprot database (version 4, total number of entries 230093, entries for Homo sapiens 14515) using ProteinPilotTM software (version 1.0, revision 33087, Applied Biosystems) with the ParagonTM method utilizing the following search parameters: H. sapiens as species, trypsin as enzyme (one missed cleavage allowed), cysteine static modification with methylmethanethiosulfate and iTRAQ (peptide labeled at N terminus and lysine) as sample type. Mass tolerance was set to 0.15 atomic mass units for precursor and 0.1 atomic mass units for fragment ions. The raw peptide identification results from the ParagonTM Algorithm (Applied Biosystems) searches were further processed by the Pro GroupTM Algorithm (Applied Biosystems) within the ProteinPilot software before final display. The Pro Group Algorithm uses the peptide identification results to determine the minimal set of proteins that can be reported for a given protein confidence threshold. For each protein, Pro Group Algorithm reports two types of scores for each protein: unused ProtScore and total ProtScore. The total ProtScore is a measurement of all the peptide evidence for a protein and is analogous to protein scores reported by other protein identification softwares. The unused ProtScore, however, is a measurement of all the peptides evidence for a protein that is not better explained by a higher ranking protein. In other words, the unused ProtScore is calculated by using the unique peptides (peptides that are not used by the higher ranking protein), and it is a true indicator of protein evidence. This is how a single-protein member of a multiprotein family has been singled out.

The protein confidence threshold cutoff for this study is ProtScore 2.0 (unused) with at least one peptide with 99% confidence. The mean, standard deviation, and p values to estimate statistical significance of the protein changes were calculated by Pro Group. Proteins identified with changes (ratio >1.2 or <0.8) that were consistent between two independent biological experiments were manually validated and quantified. Peak areas for each of the signature ions (114, 115, 116, and 117) were obtained and corrected according to the manufacturer's instructions to account for isotopic overlap. Only those signature ions with intensities less than 1500 counts were used for quantitation. In our experiment, we tend to get a 1:1 ratio if the intensities of the signature ions are higher than 1500 counts because the detector gets saturated.

Western Blot Analysis—
To verify iTRAQ data, samples (1 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE (4–12%) and transferred to PVDF membranes. After blocking 1 h at room temperature with blocking buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS/Tween 20), and 5% nonfat milk powder), membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C in primary antibody in blocking buffer. The membranes were washed with TBS/Tween 20, incubated for 1 h at room temperature in secondary antibody (alkaline phosphatase-conjugated AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA) with 1:10000 dilution in blocking buffer, and finally washed with TBS/Tween 20. Blots were developed with Immun-StarTM AP substrate Pack (BioRad) and scanned on an Epson Scan (Agilent Technologies, Foster City, CA) scanner within the linear range of detection. Primary antibodies were anti-MARCKS (1:2000 dilution), anti-phospho-MARCKS (pSer159,163,179) (1:1000 dilution), anti-MRP (1:500 dilution) rabbit polyclonal antibodies (Calbiochem) and anti-caveolin-1 (N-20) Sc-894 (1:1000 dilution) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For verification of membrane rafts fractions after ultracentrifugation using anti-caveolin-1 antibody, 10 µl of each fraction (1 ml) was loaded.

Construction and Transfection of siRNA against MARCKS and MRP—
The siRNA sequence(s) targeting human against MARCKS and MRP were generated using mRNA sequences from GenBankTM (gi:11125771 and gi:32401423, respectively). For each mRNA (or scramble), two targets were identified. Specifically, MARCKS target sequence 1 (5'-AACTACACTTGGGCTCCTTTT-3'), MARCKS target sequence 2 (5'-AAAATTTTTTTATCCGGAGTG-3'), MRP target sequence 1 (5'-AAAAGCAATGGAGACTTATCC-3'), MRP target sequence 2 (5'-AAGAAGAAGAAGAAATTCTCT-3'), scramble sequence 1 (5'-AAGAGAAATCGAAACCGAAAA-3') and scramble sequence 2 (5'-AAGAACCCAATTAAGCGCAAG-3') were utilized. Sense and antisense oligonucleotides were provided by Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. (Coralville, IA). For construction of the siRNA, a transcription-based kit from Ambion was used (SilencerTM siRNA construction kit). Human lung EC were then transfected with siRNA using siPORTamineTM as the transfection reagent (Ambion, TX) according to the protocol provided by Ambion. Cells (~ 40% confluent) were serum-starved for 1 h followed by incubation with 3 µM (1.5 µM of each siRNA) of target siRNA (or scramble siRNA or no siRNA) for 6 h in serum-free media. The serum-containing medium was then added (1% serum, final concentration) for 42 h before biochemical experiments and/or functional assays were conducted.

Measurement of TER—
EC were grown to confluence in polycarbonate wells containing evaporated gold microelectrodes, and TER measurements were performed using an electrical cell substrate impedance sensing system (Applied Biophysics, Troy, NY) as described previously (7). TER values from each microelectrode were pooled at discrete time points and plotted versus time as the mean ± S.E.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Membrane Rafts after S1P Stimulation—
In this study, iTRAQ-based stable isotope labeling of membrane rafts was carried out to obtain insight into the underlying mechanism of S1P-mediated EC barrier enhancement. The experimental strategy is shown in Fig. 1. Human pulmonary artery ECs were cultured in T150 flasks to confluence, either left untreated (control, 5 min) or treated with S1P (1 µM, 5 min). Sucrose gradient centrifugation was performed to isolate membrane rafts, and the membrane rafts fractions were verified using Western blot of EC membrane rafts marker caveolin-1 (Fig. 2). Membrane rafts fractions (fraction 4, 5, and 6 from the top) were then pooled and precipitated. Aliquots (50 µg) from each sample were than reduced and alkylated, and the resulting peptides were labeled with iTRAQ reagents (114 and 115). The two samples were mixed and analyzed by LC/MS/MS. The MS/MS fragmentation of the iTRAQ-labeled peptides results in signature peaks (114.1 and 115.1) for quantitation, and the fragmentation along the peptide backbone results in b- and y-type fragments, which may be used to identify the peptide sequence. The second independent experiment was performed in identical fashion with the exception that samples were labeled with iTRAQ reagents 116 and 117. A total of 245 non-redundant proteins were identified from EC membrane rafts (supplemental Table S1). The MS/MS spectra for the single peptide that was used to match a protein were displayed in supplemental Fig. S1. Two proteins, MARCKS and MRP, were specifically recruited to the membrane rafts upon S1P treatment in both independent biological experiments. The recruitment of these two proteins was specific as no other protein was found to be consistently altered outside the range of 0.8 to 1.2. Table I depicts the MARCKS, MRP, and caveolin-1 peptide sequences, peptide confidence, peptide ratios, protein ratios, standard deviations, and p values from the ProteinPilot software from the two independent experiments. Representative MS/MS spectra for peptides identified from MARCKS, MRP, and caveolin-1 are shown in Fig. 3, with the peaks for the signature ions shown in the insets.


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. Mass spectrometry-based approach (iTRAQ) to quantitative analysis of membrane rafts upon S1P stimulation. Cells were grown to confluence, left untreated, or treated with S1P (1 µM, 5 min). The membrane rafts were isolated using the low density detergent-resistant fractionation, precipitated, and reconstituted in 1% SDS, 100 mM TEAB, pH 8.5. The proteins were digested, labeled with iTRAQ reagents, and combined. The resulting peptides were fractionated using strong cation exchange chromatography and analyzed on LC/MS/MS.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. Western blot analysis of caveolin-1 to verify lipid raft fractions. After ultracentrifugation, 11 fractions (1 ml each) were collected, and the pellet was suspended in 1% SDS, 100 mM TEAB. An aliquot (10 µl) of each fraction was separated on 4–12% SDS-PAGE, and Western blot was carried out for caveolin-1.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE I Quantitative analysis of membrane rafts after S1P stimulation

Confluent ECs were either untreated or treated with S1P (1 µM, 5 min). Two proteins, MARCKS and MRP, showed consistent recruitment into membrane rafts upon S1P treatment from two independent experiments. The peptides identified from these two proteins, the peptide confidence, peptide ratios, protein ratios, and p values from ProteinPilot software are presented in the table.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 3. Representative MS/MS spectra for peptides derived from MARCKS, MRP, and caveolin-1. For each MS/MS spectrum, b- and y-type fragment ions enable peptide identification, whereas the peak areas for each of the iTRAQ signature ions (insets) enable quantification of the peptides and proteins. A, MS/MS spectrum of AAEEPSKVEEK from MARCKS; B, MS/MS spectrum of GEAAAERPGEAAVASSPSK from MARCKS; C, MS/MS spectrum of GDVTAEEAAGASPAK from MRP; D, MS/MS spectrum of YVDSEGHLYTVPIR from caveolin-1.

 
Confirmation of S1P-induced MARCKS and MRP Recruitment to Membrane Rafts in Human EC—
To validate our iTRAQ results, Western blot experiments were performed. Fig. 4 shows that under control conditions, a minimal level of MARCKS and MRP is present in the isolated membrane rafts (Fig. 4, A and C) and that with S1P treatment of human pulmonary EC (1 µM, 5 min) there is an extensive recruitment of MARCKS and MRP to the membrane rafts.


Figure 4
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 4. Western blot analysis of MARCKS, phospho-MARCKS, MRP, and caveolin-1 upon S1P stimulation in human EC membrane rafts. Confluent human ECs were either untreated (Control) or challenged with S1P (1 µM, 5 min), and lipid raft fractions were prepared. An aliquot (1 µg) of each sample was separated on 4–12% SDS-PAGE, and Western blots were carried out for MARCKS (A), phospho-MARCKS (B), MRP (C), and caveolin-1 (D).

 
As MARCKS is known to be phosphorylated (14, 15), the role of phosphorylation of this protein was investigated using an anti-phospho-MARCKS antibody recognizing specifically MARCKS phosphorylated at Ser159, Ser163, and Ser179. Clearly, a trace amount of phospho-MARCKS protein was present in the control membrane rafts, and there was a significant reduction in phospho-MARCKS after S1P challenge (Fig. 4B). The level of caveolin-1 was not altered by S1P stimulation (Fig. 4D), findings consistent with the iTRAQ data and previous results (7).

The Effects of MARCKS and MRP on S1P-mediated Human EC Barrier Function—
The effects of membrane rafts-associated MARCKS and MRP on S1P-mediated EC barrier regulation was then investigated using an siRNA approach. As shown in Fig. 5, siRNA transfection effectively silenced MARCKS and MRP protein expression in human EC. Whereas silencing of either MARCKS or MRP in control EC did not produce any alteration in basal barrier integrity as measured by TER, silencing either MARCKS (Fig. 6A) or MRP (Fig. 6B) significantly attenuated the rapid increase in S1P-induced EC barrier enhancement. Furthermore, dually silencing of both MARCKS and MRP (Fig. 6C) attenuated both the rapid TER increase as well as the prolonged enhancement of S1P-mediated EC barrier function. These results suggest an important, non-redundant role of MARCKS and MRP in regulating S1P-induced EC barrier protection.


Figure 5
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 5. Characterization of siRNA treatment of human EC. Cellular lysates from untransfected (Control, no siRNA), scramble siRNA (siRNA that does not target any known human mRNA), MARCKS siRNA, or MRP siRNA transfection were analyzed using Western blot with anti-MARCKS antibody (A), anti-MRP antibody (B) or anti-actin antibody (C) as described in "Experimental Procedures."

 

Figure 6
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 6. Analysis of the roles of MARCKS and MRP on S1P-induced human EC barrier function. ECs were plated on gold microelectrodes and treated with scramble siRNA (A–C), MARCKS siRNA (A), MRP siRNA (B), or MARCKS and MRP siRNA (C) for 48 h. ECs were then serum starved for 1 h followed by the addition of 1 µM S1P. TER measurements were performed using an electrical cell substrate impedance sensing system. The TER tracing represents pooled data ± S.E. from at least three independent experiments.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Since our report of S1P-induced endothelial cell activation (16), there has been increasing evidence for a role of S1P in the maintenance and restoration of the dynamic semipermeable endothelial cellular barrier in the vasculature. S1P-mediated enhancement of endothelial junctional integrity via prominent cytoskeletal rearrangement involving the translocation of key actin-binding proteins, such as cortactin and myosin light chain kinase to the cell periphery and the formation of a strong cortical actin ring (3, 5), has been defined. An emerging concept from these studies is that a marked increase in polymerized cortical actin represents a common and essential feature of barrier-protective agents such as S1P (4). Consistent with this concept, the Rho family of small GTPases, critical regulators of the non-muscle cytoskeleton, is intimately involved in S1P-mediated cytoskeletal rearrangement and distribution/assembly of intercellular adherens complexes and focal adhesions (17).

Among the proteins that have been proposed to interact with actin and to cross-link actin at the plasma membrane (18) are MARCKS (30–32 kDa) and its homologue MRP (20 kDa), which are essential proteins and products of single genes with no known isoforms (19–21). Both proteins contain three highly conserved domains including a myristoylated N terminus and an effector domain (22). The unusual biochemical properties and multiple interactions of MARCKS and MRP have led to a variety of proposed functions at the molecular level. These include binding to phospholipids including phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate (23, 24), phosphorylation by protein kinase C (14, 15), and binding and cross-linking of actin filaments (18). Upon phosphorylation, MARCKS is translocated from membrane to cytosol (25), and the actin cross-linking ability is also lost (26). MARCKS and MRP are implicated in the coordination of membrane-cytoskeletal signaling events, such as cell adhesion, migration, secretion, and phagocytosis in a variety of cell types (22, 27). However, MARCKS and MRP have not been associated with S1P-mediated barrier enhancement in EC.

Using quantitative proteomics analysis, we identified a total of 245 proteins from membrane rafts, including well known lipid raft markers such as annexin A2, caveolin-1, and flotillin-1; numerous proteins involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements; signal transduction molecules; and proteins harboring putative post-translational modifications that favor this localization in the lipid raft environment. Consistent with previous membrane rafts studies (28, 29), we also had non-rafts proteins in our membrane rafts because of the biochemical isolation of membrane rafts. However, we were able to identify the differences from rafts proteins, and the only differences in this study were from rafts proteins. We found that MARCKS and MRP are specifically recruited into membrane rafts upon S1P stimulation and that the phosphorylation of MARCKS is inhibited. Western blot experiments validated these findings. Based on our proteomics studies and biochemistry results, we propose that upon S1P stimulation, MARCKS and MRP are recruited to membrane rafts and in this locale, stabilize the newly generated rigid F-actin cytoskeleton, thereby increasing the EC barrier protection. S1P also inhibits MARCKS from phosphorylation, an event potentially linked to F-actin release and barrier regulation. Our results are not novel in the sense that these cytoskeletal proteins (MARCKS and MRP) have been reported previously as localized in membrane rafts (30). However, our proteomics, cell biologic, and physiologic data strongly suggest a paradigm where MARCKS and MRP binding and cross-linking of F-actin filaments in membrane rafts provide a novel mechanism of S1P-mediated barrier protection. Our siRNA experiments confirmed the regulation role of MARCKS and MRP in S1P-induced EC barrier enhancement and suggested that MARCKS and MRP are non-redundant in S1P-induced EC barrier protection.

In summary, although mechanisms of vascular barrier enhancement by agonists such as S1P are poorly understood, using proteomics analysis in combination of biochemistry tools, we now show that S1P-mediated cortical actin rearrangement and barrier protection are critically dependent on recruitment of MARCKS and MRP into membrane rafts.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Lakshmi Natarajan for endothelial cells.


  FOOTNOTES
 
Received, October 16, 2006, and in revised form, January 2, 2007.

Published, MCP Papers in Press, January 8, 2007, DOI 10.1074/mcp.M600398-MCP200

1 The abbreviations used are: EC, endothelial cell; S1P, sphingosine 1-phosphate; iTRAQTM, isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantitation; siRNA, small interfering RNA; TER, transendothelial electrical resistance; TEAB, triethylammonium bicarbonate; SCX, strong cation exchange; MARCKS, myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate; MRP, MARCKS-related protein. Back

* This study was supported by grants from NHLBI, National Institutes of Health Proteomics Initiative (content N01-HV-28180) (to J. V. E., J. G. N. G., and Y. G.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

S The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.mcponline.org) contains supplemental Table S1 and supplemental Fig. S1. Back

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Johns Hopkins University Bayview Campus, 5200 Eastern Ave., Mason F. Lord Bldg., Center Tower, Rm. 609, Baltimore, MD 21224. Tel.: 410-50-8501; Fax: 410-550-8512; E-mail: yguo7{at}jhmi.edu


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Gimbrone, M. A., Jr., Aster, R. H., Cotran, R. S., Corkery, J., and Folkman, J. (1969) Preservation of vascular integrity in organs perfused in vitro with a platelet-rich medium. Nature 221, 33 –36[CrossRef]

  2. Roy, A. J., and Djerassi, I. (1972) Effects of platelet transfusions: plug formation and maintenance of vascular integrity. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 139, 137 –142[CrossRef][Medline]

  3. Garcia, J. G., Liu, F., Verin, A. D., Birukova, A., Dechert, M. A., Gerthoffer, W. T., Bamburg, J. R., and English, D. (2001) Sphingosine 1-phosphate promotes endothelial cell barrier integrity by Edg-dependent cytoskeletal rearrangement. J. Clin. Investig. 108, 689 –701[CrossRef][Medline]

  4. McVerry, B. J., and Garcia, J. G. (2005) In vitro and in vivo modulation of vascular barrier integrity by sphingosine 1-phosphate: mechanistic insights. Cell. Signal. 17, 131 –139[CrossRef][Medline]

  5. Dudek, S. M., and Garcia, J. G. (2001) Cytoskeletal regulation of pulmonary vascular permeability. J. Appl. Physiol. 91, 1487 –1500[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Dudek, S. M., Jacobson, J. R., Chiang, E. T., Birukov, K. G., Wang, P., Zhan, X., and Garcia, J. G. (2004) Pulmonary endothelial cell barrier enhancement by sphingosine 1-phosphate: roles for cortactin and myosin light chain kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 24692 –24700[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Singleton, P. A., Dudek, S. M., Chiang, E. T., and Garcia, J. G. (2005) Regulation of sphingosine 1-phosphate-induced endothelial cytoskeletal rearrangement and barrier enhancement by S1P1 receptor, PI3 kinase, Tiam1/Rac1, and {alpha}-actinin. FASEB J. 19, 1646 –1656[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. Pike, L. J. (2006) Rafts defined: a report on the Keystone symposium on lipid rafts and cell function. J. Lipid Res. 47, 1597 –1598[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Friedrichson, T., and Kurzchalia, T. V., (1998) Microdomains of GPI-anchored proteins in living cells revealed by crosslinking. Nature 394, 802 –805[CrossRef][Medline]

  10. Varma, R., and Mayor, S. (1998) GPI-anchored proteins are organized in submicron domains at the cell surface. Nature 394, 798 –801[CrossRef][Medline]

  11. Pralle, A., Keller, P., Florin, E. L., Simons, K., and Horber, J. K. (2000) Sphingolipid–cholesterol rafts diffuse as small entities in the plasma membrane of mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 148, 997 –1008[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  12. Harder, T., Scheiffele, P., Verkade, P., and Simons, K. (1998) Lipid domain structure of the plasma membrane revealed by patching of membrane components. J. Cell Biol. 141, 929 –942[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Brown, D. A., and Rose, J. K. (1992) Sorting of GPI-anchored proteins to glycolipid-enriched membrane subdomains during transport to the apical cell surface. Cell , 68, 533 –544[CrossRef][Medline]

  14. Graff, J. M., Stumpo, D. J., and Blackshear, P. J. (1989) Molecular cloning, sequence, and expression of a cDNA encoding the chicken myristoylated alanine-rich protein kinase C substrate (MARCKS). Mol. Endocrinol. 3, 1903 –1906[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Blackshear, P. J., Verghese, G. M., Johnson, J. D., Haupt, D. M., and Stumpo, D. J. (1992) Characteristics of the F52 protein, a MARCKS homologue. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13540 –13546[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Natarajan, V., Jayaram, H. N., Scribner, W. M., and Garcia, J. G. (1994) Activation of endothelial cell phospholipase D by sphingosine and sphingosine-1-phosphate. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 11, 221 –229[Abstract]

  17. Wojciak-Stothard, B., and Ridley, A. J. (2002) Rho GTPases and the regulation of endothelial permeability. Vascul. Pharmacol. 39, 187 –199[CrossRef][Medline]

  18. Hartwig, J. H., Thelen, M., Rosen, P. A., Janmey, P. A., Nairn, A. C., and Aderem, A. (1992) MARCKS is an actin filament crosslinking protein regulated by protein kinase C and calcium-calmodulin. Nature 356, 618 –622[CrossRef][Medline]

  19. Stumpo, D. J., Bock, C. B., Tuttle, J. S., and Blackshear, P. J. (1995) MARCKS deficiency in mice leads to abnormal brain development and perinatal death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 944 –948[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Chen, J., Chang, S., Duncan, S. A., Okano, H. J., Fishell, G., and Aderem, A. (1996) Disruption of the MacMARCKS gene prevents cranial neural tube closure and results in anencephaly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 6275 –6279[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  21. Wu, M., Chen, D. F., Sasaoka, T., and Tonegawa, S. (1996) Neural tube defects and abnormal brain development in F52-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 2110 –2115[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  22. Sundaram, M., Cook, H. W., and Byers, D. M. (2004) The MARCKS family of phospholipid binding proteins: regulation of phospholipase D and other cellular components. Biochem. Cell Biol. 82, 191 –200[CrossRef][Medline]

  23. Taniguchi, H., and Manenti, S. (1993) Interaction of myristoylated alanine-rich protein kinase C substrate (MARCKS) with membrane phospholipids. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9960 –9963[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  24. Vergeres, G., and Ramsden, J. J. (1998) Binding of MARCKS (myristoylated alanine-rich protein kinase C substrate)-related protein (MRP) to vesicular phospholipid membranes. Biochem. J. 330, 5 –11[Medline]

  25. Arbuzova, A., Schmitz, A. A., and Vergeres, G. (2002) Cross-talk unfolded: MARCKS proteins. Biochem. J. 362, 1 –12[CrossRef][Medline]

  26. Yarmola, E. G., Edison, A. S., Lenox, R. H., and Bubb, M. R. (2001) Actin filament cross-linking by MARCKS: characterization of two actin-binding sites within the phosphorylation site domain. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 22351 –22358[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  27. Sheetz, M. P., Sable, J. E., and Dobereiner, H. (2006) Continuous membrane-cytoskeleton adhesion requires continuous accommodation to lipid and cytoskeleton dynamics. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35, 417 –434[CrossRef][Medline]

  28. Bini, L., Pacini, S., Liberatori, S., Valensin, S., Pellegrini, M., Raggiaschi, R., Pallini, V., and Baldari, C. T. (2003) Extensive temporally regulated reorganization of the lipid raft proteome following T-cell antigen receptor triggering. Biochem. J. 369, 301 –309[CrossRef][Medline]

  29. von Haller, P. D., Donohoe, S., Goodlett, D. R., Aebersold, R., and Watts, J. D. (2001) Mass spectrometric characterization of proteins extracted from Jurkat T cell detergent-resistant membrane domains. Proteomics 1, 1010 –1021[CrossRef][Medline]

  30. Laux, T., Fukami, K., Thelen, M., Golub, T., Frey, D., and Caroni, P. (2000) GAP43, MARCKS, and CAP23 modulate PI(4,5)P(2) at plasmalemmal rafts, and regulate cell cortex actin dynamics through a common mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 149, 1455 –1472[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
M. Zhu, S. Dai, S. McClung, X. Yan, and S. Chen
Functional Differentiation of Brassica napus Guard Cells and Mesophyll Cells Revealed by Comparative Proteomics
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2009; 8(4): 752 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
S. Dhungana, B. A. Merrick, K. B. Tomer, and M. B. Fessler
Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Macrophage Rafts Reveals Compartmentalized Activation of the Proteasome and of Proteasome-mediated ERK Activation in Response to Lipopolysaccharide
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2009; 8(1): 201 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
H. T. Tan, S. Tan, Q. Lin, T. K. Lim, C. L. Hew, and M. C. M. Chung
Quantitative and Temporal Proteome Analysis of Butyrate-treated Colorectal Cancer Cells
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, June 1, 2008; 7(6): 1174 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
A. J. K. Williamson, D. L. Smith, D. Blinco, R. D. Unwin, S. Pearson, C. Wilson, C. Miller, L. Lancashire, G. Lacaud, V. Kouskoff, et al.
Quantitative Proteomics Analysis Demonstrates Post-transcriptional Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation to Hematopoiesis
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, March 1, 2008; 7(3): 459 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M600398-MCP200v1
6/4/689    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Glossary
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guo, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, J. G. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guo, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, J. G. N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement