Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/mcp.M600347-MCP200 on February 9, 2007.
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 6:860-881, 2007.
© 2007 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Research
Comparison of Full Versus Partial Metabolic Labeling for Quantitative Proteomics Analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana*,S
Edward L. Huttlin , ,¶,||,
Adrian D. Hegeman , ,¶,**,
Amy C. Harms , and
Michael R. Sussman , ,
From the Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
In recent years a variety of quantitative proteomics techniques have been developed, allowing characterization of changes in protein abundance in a variety of organisms under various biological conditions. Because it allows excellent control for error at all steps in sample preparation and analysis, full metabolic labeling using 15N has emerged as an important strategy for quantitative proteomics, having been applied in a variety of organisms from yeast to Arabidopsis and even rats. However, challenges associated with complete replacement of 14N with 15N can make its application in many complex eukaryotic systems impractical on a routine basis. Extending a concept proposed by Whitelegge et al. (Whitelegge, J. P., Katz, J. E., Pihakari, K. A., Hale, R., Aguilera, R., Gomez, S. M., Faull, K. F., Vavilin, D., and Vermaas, W. (2004) Subtle modification of isotope ratio proteomics; an integrated strategy for expression proteomics. Phytochemistry 65, 15071515), we investigate an alternative strategy for quantitative proteomics that relies upon the subtle changes in isotopic envelope shape that result from partial metabolic labeling to compare relative abundances of labeled and unlabeled peptides in complex mixtures. We present a novel algorithm for the automated quantitative analysis of partial incorporation samples via LC-MS. We then compare the performance of partial metabolic labeling with traditional full metabolic labeling for quantification of controlled mixtures of labeled and unlabeled Arabidopsis peptides. Finally we evaluate the performance of each technique for comparison of light- versus dark-grown Arabidopsis with respect to reproducibility and numbers of peptide and protein identifications under more realistic experimental conditions. Overall full metabolic labeling and partial metabolic labeling prove to be comparable with respect to dynamic range, accuracy, and reproducibility, although partial metabolic labeling consistently allows quantification of a higher percentage of peptide observations across the dynamic range. This difference is especially pronounced at extreme ratios. Ultimately both full metabolic labeling and partial metabolic labeling prove to be well suited for quantitative proteomics characterization.
|| Supported by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Biotechnology Training Program (National Institutes of Health Grant 5 T32 GM08349). To whom correspondence may be addressed: Biotechnology Center, University of Wisconsin, 425 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: elhuttlin{at}wisc.edu
** To whom correspondence may be addressed: Biotechnology Center, University of Wisconsin, 425 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: hegeman{at}biochem.wisc.edu
 To whom correspondence may be addressed: Biotechnology Center, University of Wisconsin, 425 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: harms{at}biotech.wisc.edu
 To whom correspondence may be addressed: Biotechnology Center, University of Wisconsin, 425 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: msussman{at}wisc.edu

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J Moresco, M.-Q. Dong, and J. R Yates III
Quantitative mass spectrometry as a tool for nutritional proteomics
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition,
September 1, 2008;
88(3):
597 - 604.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. McIlwain, D. Page, E. L. Huttlin, and M. R. Sussman
Matching isotopic distributions from metabolically labeled samples
Bioinformatics,
July 1, 2008;
24(13):
i339 - i347.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Mock, M. P. Samanta, V. Iverson, C. Berthiaume, M. Robison, K. Holtermann, C. Durkin, S. S. BonDurant, K. Richmond, M. Rodesch, et al.
From the Cover: Whole-genome expression profiling of the marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana identifies genes involved in silicon bioprocesses
PNAS,
February 5, 2008;
105(5):
1579 - 1584.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Hebeler, S. Oeljeklaus, K. A. Reidegeld, M. Eisenacher, C. Stephan, B. Sitek, K. Stuhler, H. E. Meyer, M. J. G. Sturre, P. P. Dijkwel, et al.
Study of Early Leaf Senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana by Quantitative Proteomics Using Reciprocal 14N/15N Labeling and Difference Gel Electrophoresis
Mol. Cell. Proteomics,
January 1, 2008;
7(1):
108 - 120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Thelen and S. C. Peck
Quantitative Proteomics in Plants: Choices in Abundance
PLANT CELL,
November 1, 2007;
19(11):
3339 - 3346.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. McIlwain, D. Page, E. L. Huttlin, and M. R. Sussman
Using dynamic programming to create isotopic distribution maps from mass spectra
Bioinformatics,
July 1, 2007;
23(13):
i328 - i336.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|