|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on October 24, 2003
Discovery Protoemics, Applied Biosystems, Framingham, MA 01701
Corresponding Author: parkerkc{at}appliedbiosystems.com
As a test case for optimizing how to perform proteomics experiments, we chose a yeast model system in which the UPF1 gene, a protein involved in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, was knocked out by homologous recombination. The results from five complete ICAT experiments were combined, two using MALDI MSMS and three using electrospray MSMS. We sought to assess the reproducibility of peptide identification, and to develop an informatics structure that characterizes the identification process as well as possible, especially with regard to tenuous identifications. The cleavable form of the ICAT reagent system (Gygi et al., Nature Biotechnology 17:994,1999) was used for quantification. Most proteins did not change significantly in expression as a consequence of the upf1 knockout. As expected, the Upf1 protein itself was down-regulated, and there were reproducible increases in expression of proteins involved in arginine biosynthesis. Initially, it seemed that about 10% of the proteins had changed in expression level, but after more thorough examination of the data it turned out that most of these apparent changes could be explained by artifacts of quantification caused by overlapping heavy / light (HL) pairs. About 700 proteins altogether were identified with high confidence and quantified. Many peptides with chemical modifications were identified, as well as peptides with non-canonical tryptic termini. Nearly all of these modified peptides corresponded to the most abundant yeast proteins, and some would otherwise have been attributed to single hit proteins at low confidence. To improve our confidence in the identifications, in MALDI experiments, the parent masses for the peptides were calibrated against nearby components. In addition, 5 novel parameters reflecting different aspects of identification were collected for each spectrum in addition to the Mascot score that was originally used. The interrelationship between these scoring parameters and confidence in protein identification is discussed.
Revised on March 25, 2004
Accepted on March 28, 2004
Depth of proteome issues: A yeast ICAT reagent study
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. G. Malkowski, E. Quartley, A. E. Friedman, J. Babulski, Y. Kon, J. Wolfley, M. Said, J. R. Luft, E. M. Phizicky, G. T. DeTitta, et al. Blocking S-adenosylmethionine synthesis in yeast allows selenomethionine incorporation and multiwavelength anomalous dispersion phasing PNAS, April 17, 2007; 104(16): 6678 - 6683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Beynon and J. M. Pratt Metabolic Labeling of Proteins for Proteomics Mol. Cell. Proteomics, July 1, 2005; 4(7): 857 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Ross, Y. N. Huang, J. N. Marchese, B. Williamson, K. Parker, S. Hattan, N. Khainovski, S. Pillai, S. Dey, S. Daniels, et al. Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2004; 3(12): 1154 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |