MCP Thermo Scientific TMT Isobaric Mass Tagging Kits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M500426-MCP200v1
5/7/1205    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Glossary
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stead, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, A. J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stead, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, A. J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on December 23, 2005
Accepted on March 27, 2006

Universal metrics for quality assessment of protein identifications by mass spectrometry

David A. Stead, Alun Preece, and Alistair J. P. Brown

School of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD

Corresponding Author: al.brown{at}abdn.ac.uk

Increasing numbers of large proteomic datasets are becoming available. As attempts are made to interpret these datasets and integrate them with other forms of genomic data, researchers are becoming more aware of the importance of data quality with respect to protein identification. We present three simple and universal metrics that describe different aspects of the quality of protein identifications by peptide mass fingerprinting. Hit ratio (HR) gives an indication of the signal to noise ratio in a mass spectrum, mass coverage (MC) measures the amount of protein sequence matched, and excess of limit-digested peptides (ELDP) reflects the completeness of the digestion that precedes the peptide mass fingerprinting. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots show that the novel metric, ELDP, can discriminate between correct and random matches more accurately than search score when validating the results from a state-of-the-art protein identification software system (Mascot), especially when combined with the two other metrics, HR and MC. Recommendations are made regarding the use of the metrics when reporting protein identification experiments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
A. Alexandridou, G. Th. Tsangaris, K. Vougas, K. Nikita, and G. Spyrou
Peptide Finder: mapping measured molecular masses to peptides and proteins
Bioinformatics, October 1, 2008; 24(19): 2267 - 2269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
D. A. Stead, N. W. Paton, P. Missier, S. M. Embury, C. Hedeler, B. Jin, A. J. P. Brown, and A. Preece
Information quality in proteomics
Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2008; 9(2): 174 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.