MCP Sign the guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M600222-MCP200v1
5/10/1927    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Glossary
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on June 13, 2006
Revised on July 19, 2006
Accepted on July 19, 2006

PEPPeR: A platform for experimental proteomic pattern recognition

Jacob D. Jaffe, D. R. Mani, Kyriacos C. Leptos, George M. Church, Michael A. Gillette, and Steven A. Carr

Proteomics and Biomarker Discovery, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142-2025

Corresponding Author: scarr{at}broad.mit.edu

Quantitative proteomics holds considerable promise for elucidation of basic biology and for clinical biomarker discovery. However, it has been difficult to fulfill this promise due to over-reliance on identification-based quantitative methods and problems associated with chromatographic separation reproducibility. Here we describe new algorithms termed ‘Landmark Matching’ and ‘Peak Matching’ that greatly reduce these problems. Landmark Matching performs time base-independent propagation of peptide identities onto accurate mass LC-MS features in a way that leverages historical data derived from disparate data acquisition strategies. Peak Matching builds upon Landmark Matching by recognizing identical molecular species across multiple LC-MS experiments in an identity-independent fashion by clustering. We have bundled these algorithms together with other algorithms, data acquisition strategies, and experimental designs to create a Platform for Experimental Proteomic Pattern Recognition (PEPPeR). These developments enable use of established statistical tools previously limited to microarray analysis for treatment of proteomics data. We demonstrate that the proposed platform can be calibrated across 2.5 orders of magnitude and can perform robust quantification of ratios in both simple and complex mixtures with good precision and error characteristics across multiple sample preparations. We also demonstrate de novo marker discovery based on statistical significance of unidentified accurate mass components that changed between two mixtures. These markers were subsequently identified by accurate mass driven MS/MS acquisition and demonstrated to be contaminant proteins associated with known proteins whose concentrations were designed to change between the two mixtures. These results have provided a realworld validation of the platform for marker discovery.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Physiol. GenomicsHome page
E. W. Deutsch, H. Lam, and R. Aebersold
Data analysis and bioinformatics tools for tandem mass spectrometry in proteomics
Physiol Genomics, October 8, 2008; 33(1): 18 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
J. D. Jaffe, H. Keshishian, B. Chang, T. A. Addona, M. A. Gillette, and S. A. Carr
Accurate Inclusion Mass Screening: A Bridge from Unbiased Discovery to Targeted Assay Development for Biomarker Verification
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2008; 7(10): 1952 - 1962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Brief Funct Genomic ProteomicHome page
M. Wang, J. You, K. G. Bemis, T. J. Tegeler, and D. P. G. Brown
Label-free mass spectrometry-based protein quantification technologies in proteomic analysis
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, June 25, 2008; (2008) eln031v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
A. Prakash, B. Piening, J. Whiteaker, H. Zhang, S. A. Shaffer, D. Martin, L. Hohmann, K. Cooke, J. M. Olson, S. Hansen, et al.
Assessing Bias in Experiment Design for Large Scale Mass Spectrometry-based Quantitative Proteomics
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2007; 6(10): 1741 - 1748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
P. R. Cutillas and B. Vanhaesebroeck
Quantitative Profile of Five Murine Core Proteomes Using Label-free Functional Proteomics
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, September 1, 2007; 6(9): 1560 - 1573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.