MCP AbD Serotec
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M600378-MCP200v1
6/7/1170    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Glossary
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeSouza, L. V.
Right arrow Articles by Siu, K.W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeSouza, L. V.
Right arrow Articles by Siu, K.W. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on October 2, 2006
Revised on January 29, 2007
Accepted on March 19, 2007

Endometrial carcinoma biomarker discovery and verification using differentially tagged clinical samples with multidimensional liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry

Leroi V. DeSouza, Jorg Grigull, Shaun Ghanny, Valerie Dube, Alexander D. Romaschin, Terence J. Colgan, and K.W. Michael Siu

Chemistry, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3

Corresponding Author: kwmsiu{at}yorku.ca

The utility of differentially expressed proteins discovered and identified in an earlier study (DeSouza, L et al. J. Proteome Res. 2005; 4: 377-386) to discriminate malignant and benign endometrial tissue samples has been verified in a 40-sample iTRAQ-labeling study involving normal proliferative and secretory samples, and Types I and II endometrial cancer samples. None of these proteins had the sensitivity and specificity to be used individually to discriminate between normal and cancer samples. However, a panel of pyruvate kinase, chaperonin 10, and a-1-antitrypsin, achieved the best results with a sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and positive predictive value of 0.95 in a logistic regression analysis. In addition, three new potential markers were discovered, while two other proteins showed promising trends, but were not detected in sufficient numbers of samples to permit statistical validation. Differential expressions of some of these candidate biomarkers were independently verified using immunohistochemistry.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
R. Ralhan, L. V. DeSouza, A. Matta, S. Chandra Tripathi, S. Ghanny, S. Datta Gupta, S. Bahadur, and K. W. M. Siu
Discovery and Verification of Head-and-neck Cancer Biomarkers by Differential Protein Expression Analysis Using iTRAQ Labeling, Multidimensional Liquid Chromatography, and Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, June 1, 2008; 7(6): 1162 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.