MCP Waters-The Science of What's Possible
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M700240-MCP200v1
7/4/631    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Glossary
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pavelka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Washburn, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pavelka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Washburn, M. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on May 23, 2007
Revised on November 16, 2007
Accepted on November 19, 2007

Statistical similarities between transcriptomics and quantitative shotgun proteomics data

Norman Pavelka, Marjorie L. Fournier, Selene K. Swanson, Mattia Pelizzola, Paola Ricciardi-Castagnoli, Laurence Florens, and Michael P. Washburn

Proteomics, Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110

Corresponding Author: mpw{at}stowers-institute.org

If the large collection of microarray-specific statistical tools was applicable to the analysis of quantitative shotgun proteomics datasets, it would certainly foster an important advancement of proteomics research. Here, we analyze two large multi-dimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT) datasets – one containing 8 replicates of the soluble fraction of a yeast whole-cell lysate, one containing 9 replicates of a human immuno-precipitate – to test whether normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF) values share substantially similar statistical properties with transcript abundance values from Affymetrix GeneChip data. First, we show similar dynamic range and distribution properties of these two types of numeric values. Next, we observe that the standard deviation (SD) of a protein’s NSAF values is dependent on the average NSAF value of the protein itself, following a power law. This relationship can be modeled by a power law global error model (PLGEM), initially developed to describe the variance-versus-mean dependence that exists in GeneChip data. PLGEM parameters obtained from NSAF datasets prove to be surprisingly similar to the typical parameters observed in GeneChip datasets. The most important common feature identified by this approach is that, although in absolute terms the SD of replicated abundance values increases as a function of increasing average abundance, the coefficient of variation – a relative measure of variability – becomes progressively smaller under the same conditions. We next show that PLGEM parameters are reasonably stable to decreasing numbers of replicates. We finally illustrate one possible application of PLGEM in the identification of differentially abundant proteins, which might potentially outperform standard statistical tests. In summary, we believe that this body of work lays the foundation for the application of microarray-specific tools in the analysis of NSAF datasets.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.