MCP Tips for better browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M700306-MCP200v1
7/5/845    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Glossary
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mousson, F.
Right arrow Articles by Heck, A. J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mousson, F.
Right arrow Articles by Heck, A. J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on July 5, 2007
Revised on December 17, 2007
Accepted on December 17, 2007

Quantitative proteomics reveals regulation of dynamic components within TATA-binding protein (TBP) transcription complexes

Florence Mousson, Annemieke Kolkman, W. W. M. Pim Pijnappel, H. Th. Marc Timmers, and Albert J. R. Heck

Pharmmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CA

Corresponding Author: a.j.r.heck{at}uu.nl

Affinity purification in combination with isotope labeling of proteins has proven to be a powerful method to discriminate specific from non-specific interactors. However, in the standard SILAC (Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture) approach dynamic components may easily be assigned as non-specific. We compared two affinity purification protocols, which in combination revealed information on the dynamics of protein complexes. We focused on the central component in eukaryotic transcription, the human TATA binding protein (TBP), which is involved in different complexes. All known TBP associated factors (TAFs) were detected as specific interactors. Interestingly, one of them, BTAF1, exchanged significantly in cell extracts during the affinity purification. The other TAFs did not display this behavior. Cell cycle synchronization showed that BTAF1 exchange was regulated during mitosis. The combination of the two affinity purification protocols allows a quantitative approach to identify transient components in any protein complex.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.