MCP Danish Cancer Society
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2002.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
R200007-MCP200v1
1/11/845    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Glossary
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, N. L.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, N. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, N. L.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, N. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on October 13, 2002
Revised on October 28, 2002
Accepted on October 29, 2002

The human plasma proteome: History, character, and diagnostic prospects

N. Leigh Anderson and Norman G. Anderson

Plasma Proteome Institute, Washington, DC 20009-3450

Corresponding Author: leighanderson{at}plasmaproteome.org

The human plasma proteome holds the promise of a revolution in disease diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring, provided that major challenges in proteomics and related disciplines can be addressed. Plasma is not only the primary clinical specimen, but also represents the largest and deepest version of the human proteome present in any sample: in addition to the classical “plasma proteins”, it contains all tissue proteins (as leakage markers) plus very numerous distinct immunoglobulin sequences; and it has an extraordinary dynamic range, in that more than 10 orders of magnitude in concentration separate albumin and the rarest proteins now measured clinically. Although the restricted dynamic range of conventional proteomics has limited its contribution to the list of 289 proteins (tabulated here) that have been reported in plasma to date, very recent advances in multi-dimensional survey techniques promise at least double this number in the near future. Abundant scientific evidence, from proteomics and other disciplines, suggests that among these are proteins whose abundances and structures change in ways indicative of many, if not most, human diseases. Nevertheless, only a handful of proteins are currently used in routine clinical diagnosis, and the rate of introduction of new protein tests approved by the US FDA has paradoxically declined over the last decade to less than one new protein diagnostic marker per year. We speculate on the reasons behind this large discrepancy between the expectations arising from proteomics and the realities of clinical diagnostics, and suggest approaches by which protein-disease associations may be more effectively translated into diagnostic tools in the future.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.