If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Department of Proteomics, The NNF Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark;Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Goethe University School of Medicine, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany;
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Department of Proteomics, The NNF Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. Tel.:353-25020;
* This work is supported by the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme grant Proteomics Research Infrastructure Maximizing Knowledge Exchange and Access (INFRASTRUCTURES-F7-2010-262067/PRIME-XS), and the Lundbeck Foundation (R48-A4649). SAW is supported by a postdoctoral grant from Danish Council for Independent Research (FSS: 10-085134). The Center for Protein Research is funded by a generous grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation. This article contains supplemental Fig. S1 and Tables S1 and S2. ** These authors contributed equally.
Posttranslational modifications of proteins increase the complexity of the cellular proteome and enable rapid regulation of protein functions in response to environmental changes. Protein ubiquitylation is a central regulatory posttranslational modification that controls numerous biological processes including proteasomal degradation of proteins, DNA damage repair and innate immune responses. Here we combine high-resolution mass spectrometry with single-step immunoenrichment of di-glycine modified peptides for mapping of endogenous putative ubiquitylation sites in murine tissues. We identify more than 20,000 unique ubiquitylation sites on proteins involved in diverse biological processes. Our data reveals that ubiquitylation regulates core signaling pathways common for each of the studied tissues. In addition, we discover that ubiquitylation regulates tissue-specific signaling networks. Many tissue-specific ubiquitylation sites were obtained from brain highlighting the complexity and unique physiology of this organ. We further demonstrate that different di-glycine-lysine-specific monoclonal antibodies exhibit sequence preferences, and that their complementary use increases the depth of ubiquitylation site analysis, thereby providing a more unbiased view of protein ubiquitylation.
Ubiquitin is a small 76-amino-acid protein that is conjugated to the ε-amino group of lysines in a highly orchestrated enzymatic cascade involving ubiquitin activating (E1), ubiquitin conjugating (E2), and ubiquitin ligase (E3) enzymes (
). Large-scale mapping of ubiquitylation sites by mass spectrometry is based on the identification of the di-glycine remnant that results from trypsin digestion of ubiquitylated proteins and remains attached to ubiquitylated lysines (
). These antibodies have been used to identify thousands of endogenous ubiquitylation sites in human cells, and to quantify site-specific changes in ubiquitylation in response to different cellular perturbations (
). It should be noted that the di-glycine remnant is not specific for proteins modified by ubiquitin but also proteins modified by NEDD8 or ISG15 generate an identical di-glycine remnant on modified lysines making it impossible to distinguish between these modifications by mass spectrometry. However, expression of NEDD8 in mouse tissues was shown to be developmentally down-regulated (
The rates of cell proliferation and protein turnover in mammals vary dramatically between different tissues. Immortalized cell lines, often derived from cancer, are selected for high proliferation rates and fail to represent the complex conditions in tissues. Tissue proteomics can help to gain a more comprehensive understanding of physiological processes in multicellular organisms. Analysis of tissue proteome and PTMs can provide important insights into tissue-specific processes and signaling networks that regulate these processes (
). In addition, development of mass spectrometric methods for analysis of PTMs in diseased tissues might lead to the identification of biomarkers.
In this study, we combined high-resolution mass spectrometry with immunoenrichment of di-glycine modified peptides to investigate endogenous ubiquitylation sites in murine tissues. We identified more than 20,000 ubiquitylation sites from five different murine tissues and report the largest ubiquitylation dataset obtained from mammalian tissues to date. Furthermore, we compared the performance of the two monoclonal di-glycine-lysine-specific antibodies available for enrichment of ubiquitylated peptides, and reveal their relative preferences for different amino acids flanking ubiquitylation sites.
To map endogenous ubiquitylation sites in murine tissues, we extracted brain, heart, kidney, liver, and skeletal muscle from 10-week-old male C57BL/6 mice. The corresponding tissues were pooled and lysed together to minimize inter-individual differences. Equal amounts (∼20 mg) of proteins from each tissue were digested using trypsin and peptides containing di-glycine remnants were immunoenriched using two different di-glycine-specific monoclonal antibodies (
). The peptides were further fractionated using micro-column-based strong-cation exchange chromatography and analyzed by liquid chromatography connected to a hybrid linear ion-trap Orbitrap (LTQ-Orbitrap Velos, Thermo Scientific) or quadrupole Orbitrap (Q-Exactive, Thermo Scientific) mass spectrometer, as described previously (
Using the described workflow and two different di-glycine-specific antibodies, we identified more than 20,000 unique endogenous ubiquitylation sites that were mapped to a single lysine with localization probability >0.9 (Fig. 1B and supplemental Table S1). The largest number of sites was identified from liver (14,089 sites). In contrast, only 2504 sites were identified from skeletal muscle although the same amount of protein lysate was used in these experiments. About 58% of the reported ubiquitylation sites were identified only in one of the studied tissues, with liver contributing the largest fraction of unique sites (Fig. 1B). Notably, a relatively large number of tissue-specific ubiquitylation sites were found in brain. To generate a high quality data set, we performed at least two replicate experiments using both di-glycine-specific antibodies for each tissue. Over 70% of the reported sites were identified in more than one experiment (Fig. 1C). In case of liver, we performed three replicate experiments and identified over 7000 di-glycine-lysine sites in each experiment with site overlap ranging from 67–92% (Fig. 1D).
To uncover biological processes associated with ubiquitylated proteins, and to compare ubiquitylation profiles between the examined tissues, we performed Gene Ontology (GO) biological process term enrichment analysis followed by hierarchical clustering (Fig. 2A and supplemental Table S2). Our analysis revealed an enrichment of similar terms in the case of skeletal muscle and heart. In muscle tissues, proteins involved in muscle contraction such as myosin family proteins and proteins involved in metabolic processes are ubiquitylated. Brain showed a very distinct pattern with enrichment of brain-specific terms such as “synaptic transmission” and “regulation of neurotransmitter levels.” In agreement with this, comparison of ubiquitylation sites identified in brain with sites identified in other tissues revealed that many ubiquitylation sites in brain are present on proteins residing in the plasma membrane such as neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels (Fig. 2B).
In contrast to tissue-specific sites, a distinct subset of ubiquitylation sites was commonly identified in multiple tissues (in at least four out of the five tissues analyzed) (Fig. 2C). To understand the cellular role of these sites and proteins, we performed GO biological process term enrichment analysis (Fig. 2D). Proteins with ubiquitylation sites that were identified in the majority of the tissues participate in ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation, nucleosome organization, metabolic processes and translation. We identified all known sites on ubiquitin itself as well as sites on the ubiquitin-like modifiers NEDD8, SUMO2, and SUMO3. Interestingly, many components of the ubiquitylation machinery, such as E1, E2, and E3 enzymes and de-ubiquitylases, are extensively modified. In addition, many metabolic enzymes, heat-shock proteins, and ribosomal proteins are ubiquitylated in all examined tissues.
Ubiquitylation of histones has been implicated in the regulation of gene transcription and the response to DNA damage (
). These studies reported differences in the amino acid sequences flanking the ubiquitylation sites. However, it remained unclear whether these differences were attributable to sequence preferences of the antibodies, or to differences in sample processing workflow. To understand the basis of these results, we compared the two monoclonal antibodies side-by-side. We divided each peptide sample from the five tissues in two equal parts and performed the enrichment of di-glycine modified peptides separately with each antibody. Although the absolute numbers of ubiquitylation sites identified with the two antibodies are not directly comparable because of differences in the antibody formulations (for details see Experimental procedures section), we find a large overlap of the identified sites indicating that both antibodies recognize di-glycine in a wide range of sequence contexts (Fig. 3A). Direct comparison of the ubiquitylation sites identified with the different antibodies revealed that each antibody enriched a distinct subset of ubiquitylation sites (Fig. 3B, 3C, and supplemental Fig. S1C). The monoclonal antibody clone GX41 (
) showed a significant preference for nonpolar amino acids including leucine and isoleucine as well as for tyrosine in positions next to the modified lysine. The rabbit monoclonal antibody available in the Ubiquitin Remnant Motif Kit (
) showed a preference for the acidic amino acids aspartic acid and glutamic acid surrounding di-glycine modified lysines (Fig. 3C). These data indicate that at least one of the available antibodies preferentially recognizes di-glycine modified lysines in specific sequence contexts.
In this study we demonstrate the enrichment of endogenous ubiquitylated peptides from murine tissue lysates and their subsequent identification by mass spectrometry. The presented data set contains more than 20,000 endogenous murine ubiquitylation sites and by far exceeds the number of previously known ubiquitylation sites in this important model organism.
Interestingly, our analysis reveals differences in the number of ubiquitylation sites identified in each of the studied tissues. The large number of sites identified from liver tissue might reflect the high rate of protein synthesis and degradation in hepatocytes. This is in accordance with previous reports indicating that hepatocytes contain high proteasome concentrations (
). In contrast, the low number of sites identified in skeletal muscle lysates can possibly be explained by the high abundance of structural proteins in this tissue.
In addition to liver, we identified numerous unique ubiquitylation sites from brain tissue. Many of these sites are located on brain-specific plasma membrane proteins including neurotransmitter receptors and ion-channels, which is in agreement with studies demonstrating the high complexity of the brain proteome (
). Interestingly, GO biological process term analysis of proteins ubiquitylated in different tissues demonstrated that brain and kidney contained a large fraction of ubiquitylation sites on proteins annotated with the term “plasma membrane.” The frequent occurrence of ubiquitylation on plasma membrane proteins might reflect the role of ubiquitylation in controlling the function of cell surface receptors in brain and kidney.
Our analysis suggests that in addition to tissue-specific expression of proteins, tissue-specific post-translational modifications of proteins by ubiquitylation may further increase the complexity of the proteome and contribute to the distinct phenotype of cells in multicellular organisms. However, given the vast abundance differences of proteins in different tissues, it is difficult to distinguish tissue-specific ubiquitylation from tissue-specific protein expression.
Notably, a subset of proteins is ubiquitylated in all studied tissues. These proteins include E1, E2 and E3 enzymes and de-ubiquitylases for which it remains unclear whether ubiquitylation is a site-specific regulatory process or occurs as bystander effect because of their involvement in the ubiquitylation machinery. In contrast, the site-specific ubiquitylation of histones is a well-known regulatory mechanism of gene expression and DNA damage response and our results highlight the relevance of these modifications in a physiological context (
We show that both monoclonal di-glycine-specific antibodies efficiently enrich di-glycine modified peptides from complex peptide mixtures and find a large overlap between the ubiquitylation sites identified with the two antibodies. However, direct comparison of ubiquitylation sites exclusively identified with one of the antibodies revealed relative preferences for specific amino acids flanking ubiquitylation sites. It remains difficult to define a valid ubiquitylation motif using these apparently biased enrichment strategies. Our results indicate that both antibodies are suited for efficient enrichment of di-glycine modified peptides in routine applications. Complementary use of both antibodies can in certain cases increase the depth of ubiquitylation site analysis and may help to obtain a more unbiased view of this modification.
Importantly, the presented workflow can be adapted to study changes of protein ubiquitylation in murine models of neurodegenerative and other diseases. Furthermore, the method is not limited to murine tissues, but can be applied to analyze ubiquitylation in tissues and primary cells from diverse organisms.
We thank Lumnije Kamilji and Sahar Abelechian for excellent technical support and the members of the Department of Proteomics at the CPR for helpful discussions.